Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30950703›Full record

Trial reportJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2019

Secondary Voice Outcomes of a Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Two Head/Neck Strengthening Exercises in Healthy Older Adults: A Preliminary Report.

Robert Brinton Fujiki, Abby J Oliver, M Preeti Sivasankar, Bruce A Craig, Georgia A Malandraki

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Voice Meets Swallowing: A Scoping Review of Therapeutic Connections.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Restoration Strategies Following Short-Term Vocal Exertion in Healthy Young Adults.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Robert Brinton FujikiDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Purdue University,West Lafayette, IN.
Abby J OliverDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Purdue University,West Lafayette, IN.
M Preeti SivasankarDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Purdue University,West Lafayette, IN.
Bruce A CraigDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Purdue University,West Lafayette, IN.
Georgia A MalandrakiDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Purdue University,West Lafayette, IN.
Purdue University West Lafayette · US

Funding

Diversity SupplementT32DC000030 · NIDCD · PURDUE UNIVERSITY WEST LAFAYETTE · PI Arielle Borovsky, Preeti M. Sivasankar · 1991 to 2026
$5.4M
NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC000030
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose The aim of this study was to investigate secondary voice outcomes and detraining effects of 2 head and neck strengthening exercises, which have been used in swallowing rehabilitation, that is, the head-lift exercise (HLE) and the recline exercise (RE), in healthy older adults. Method Twenty-seven healthy older adults (between 60 and 85 years of age) were randomized to perform either the RE or the HLE for a 6-week period. Isometric and isokinetic portions of the exercise were performed 3 times daily. Patients were evaluated at baseline, postexercise, and following a 6-week detraining period. Acoustic outcome measures included the highest and lowest frequencies of vocal range on pitch glides (measured in hertz) and cepstral peak prominence on sustained vowels and connected speech. Self-perceptual measures included perceived phonatory effort. Results Twenty-two individuals completed their assigned exercise regimen. No significant differences between exercise groups were observed at baseline for age, body mass index, or body fat percentage. A significant postexercise increase was seen in the highest frequency of vocal range on pitch glide, t(2, 56.79) = -10.28, p ≤ .0001, for both groups. This increase was not fully maintained following the 6-week detraining period; however, data remained significantly above baseline at this time point, t(2, 57.01) = -4.70, p ≤ .0001. Seventeen of the individuals who made postexercise gains were followed postdetraining. On average, these 17 individuals maintained 51% of their postexercise gains in the highest frequency of vocal range. No differences were observed between exercise groups. In addition, no significant changes in the lowest frequency of vocal range, cepstral peak prominence on sustained vowels or connected speech, or perceived phonatory effort were observed following the exercise regimens. Conclusions Both the HLE and the RE produced gains in the highest frequency of vocal range in healthy older adults. This finding is promising; however, further research is required to understand how suprahyoid muscle strengthening influences upper pitch range and whether this relationship has potential clinical implications for patients with dysphonia.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overExercise TherapyFemaleHeadHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleMiddle AgedMuscle StrengthNeckPerceptionPhonationSelf ConceptSpeech AcousticsVoice Quality

Identifiers

PMID30950703
PMCPMC6436891
OpenAlexW2913139884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.