Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30950241›Full record

SynthesisCancer medicine2019

Prognostic role of cyclin D2/D3 in multiple human malignant neoplasms: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Zuo-You Ding, Ran Li, Qi-Jie Zhang, Yi Wang, Yi Jiang, Qing-Yang Meng, Qiu-Lei Xi, Guo-Hao Wu

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cancer medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zuo-You DingDepartment of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Ran LiDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Qi-Jie ZhangDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Yi WangDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Yi JiangDepartment of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Qing-Yang MengDepartment of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Qiu-Lei XiDepartment of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Guo-Hao WuDepartment of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5146-660X
Sun Yat-sen University · CNJiangsu Province Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cyclin D2/D3 (CCND2/3) are core components of the machinery that drives cell cycle progression and therefore, are associated with tumorigenesis. Currently, there are contradictory evidences on the function of CCND2/3 in tumorigenesis. Thus, we conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis to derive a precise predictive value of CCND2/3 in various tumors. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science for eligible studies up to October 8, 2018. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of OS or DFS/PFS/RFS were calculated using Forest plot analysis to demonstrate their associations. A total of 14 studies were ultimately included in this meta-analysis. Our results indicated CCND2/3 played an oncogenic role in all of the cancer patients (CCND2: pooled HR = 2.21, 95% CI: 1.67-2.93; CCND3: pooled HR = 2.29, 95% CI: 1.05-5.03). In tumor subgroup, CCND2 was associated with shorter OS in patients with gastric cancer (HR = 2.20, 95% CI: 1.66-2.92), whereas it might be a tumor suppressor in NSCLC (HR = 0.28, 95% CI: 0.12-0.64). In addition, CCND3 was correlated to reduced OS in breast cancer patients (HR = 1.64, 95% CI: 1.07-2.52) and shorter DFS/PFS/RFS in bladder cancer patients (HR = 4.60, 95% CI: 1.89-12.57). Taken together, CCND2/3 could be the promising biomarkers for predicting the prognosis of patients with malignant neoplasms.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCyclin D2Cyclin D3Databases, GeneticDisease SusceptibilityGene ExpressionHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateNeoplasmsPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsPublication BiasBiomarkers, TumorCyclin D2Cyclin D3Cyclin D2Cyclin D3meta-analysisprognosis

Identifiers

PMID30950241
PMCPMC6558476
OpenAlexW2927322717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.