Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30950144›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID2019

"Moving on" through the locked ward system for women with intellectual disabilities.

Rebecca Fish, Hannah Morgan

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. "Moving on" through the locked ward system for women with intellectual disabilities.Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rebecca FishCentre for Disability Research, Lancaster University, Bailrigg, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1933-1769
Hannah MorganCentre for Disability Research, Lancaster University, Bailrigg, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1039-9337
Lancaster University · GB

Funding

Economic and Social Research Council ES/H037594/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe move to community support for all people with intellectual disabilities is an aspiration with international significance. In this article, we draw on rich accounts from women with intellectual disabilities detained under the Mental Health Act (E&W) 1983 and staff at an National Health Service secure setting in England to explore how "moving on" is defined and perceived.

methodsThe study reports on an ethnographic study using the field-notes and the 26 semi-structured interviews with detained women and staff on three wards.

resultsWe first explore staff conceptions of moving on, which include behavioural change and utilizing coping strategies. Then, we discuss the areas of analysis that women discussed: taking back responsibility, success in arranged relationships, acceptance of regime and resistance to progression.

conclusionThe concepts of moving on were not determined by the women but by the service. We recommend further research which explores women's own rehabilitation requirements.

Indexed as

InstitutionalizationInvoluntary Treatment, PsychiatricAdultEnglandFemaleHumansIntellectual DisabilityLegislation as TopicNational Health ProgramsPersonal AutonomyPersons with Intellectual DisabilitiesQualitative Researchforensic servicesinstitutionalizationintellectual disabilitiesrecoverysecure settings

Identifiers

PMID30950144
PMCPMC6850027
OpenAlexW2930030479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.