ArticleMolecular diversity2020
Identification of pyrrolo-pyridine derivatives as novel class of antibacterials.
Article in Molecular diversity, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unlocking the Potential of Pyrrole: Recent Advances in New Pyrrole-Containing Compounds with Antibacterial Potential.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Far-Red Fluorescent Proteins: Tools for Advancing In Vivo Imaging.Biosensors · 2024Review
- An Overview of the Biological Activity of Pyrrolo[3,4-Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A series of 5-oxo-4H-pyrrolo[3,2-b]pyridine derivatives was identified as novel class of highly potent antibacterial agents during an extensive large-scale high-throughput screening (HTS) program utilizing a unique double-reporter system-pDualrep2. The construction of the reporter system allows us to perform visual inspection of the underlying mechanism of action due to two genes-Katushka2S and RFP-which encode the proteins with different imaging signatures. Antibacterial activity of the compounds was evaluated during the initial HTS round and subsequent rescreen procedure. The most active molecule demonstrated a MIC value of 3.35 µg/mL against E. coli with some signs of translation blockage (low Katushka2S signal) and no SOS response. The compound did not demonstrate cytotoxicity in standard cell viability assay. Subsequent structural morphing and follow-up synthesis may result in novel compounds with a meaningful antibacterial potency which can be reasonably regarded as an attractive starting point for further in vivo investigation and optimization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30949901What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.