ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2020
The 100 most influential manuscripts in robotic surgery: a bibliometric analysis.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Suggestions and insights from 28 bibliometric studies in the Journal of Robotic Surgery.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Unveiling the Chasm in Japanese robot-assisted surgery diffusion: the interplay of surgical volume and intra-specialty spillover.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Latin American and Caribbean participation in robot-assisted surgery research: productivity, collaboration, and research themes.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Colorectal Cancer Surgery: Laparoscopic vs. Robotic Approaches-A Review of the Literature.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Bibliometric mapping of transoral robotic surgery literature (2005-2025): disciplinary maturation, global research architecture, and emerging knowledge domains.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- Orthopedic robotic surgery: multiple analytical approaches and a bibliometric study of the top 100 most cited papers.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Analysis of 11 bibliometric publications in the Journal of Robotic Surgery: a few suggestions.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Review
- Review
- Robotic surgery: bibliometric analysis, continental distribution, and co-words analysis from 2001 to 2023.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Review
- Comparative study of robotic-assisted vs. laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: a single-center experience.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- The 100 most cited articles on trachoma: a bibliometric analysis.International ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Bibliometric analysis of the 100 top-cited articles on immunotherapy of urological cancer.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2022Article
- A Bibliometric of Trends on Acupuncture Research About Migraine: Quantitative and Qualitative Analyses.Journal of pain research · 2022Article
- Top 100 Cited Articles on Osteoarthritis from 1990 to 2020.Rheumatology and immunology research · 2021Article
- Robotic Surgery: At the Crossroads of a Data Explosion.World journal of surgery · 2021Review
- A bibliometric of publication trends in medical image segmentation: Quantitative and qualitative analysis.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2021Article
- Propensity score-matched analysis comparing laparoscopic to robotic surgery for colorectal cancer shows comparable clinical and oncological outcomes.Journal of robotic surgery · 2021Article
- Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: a case-control study.Radiology and oncology · 2021Article
- The role of artificial intelligence in healthcare: a structured literature review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2021Article
- Global research trends in COVID-19 with MRI and PET/CT: a scoping review with bibliometric and network analyses.Clinical and translational imaging · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since the first robotic assisted surgery in 1985, the number of procedures performed annually has steadily increased. Bibliometric analysis highlights the key studies that have influenced current practice in a field of interest. We use bibliometric analysis to evaluate the 100 most cited manuscripts on robotic surgery and discuss their content and influence on the evolution of the platform. The terms 'robotic surgery,' 'robot assisted surgery' and 'robot-assisted surgery' were used to search Thomson Reuters Web of Science database for full length, English language manuscripts. The top 100 cited manuscripts were analyzed by manuscript type, surgical specialty, first and last author, institution, year and journal of publication. 14,980 manuscripts were returned. Within the top 100 cited manuscripts, the majority featured urological surgery (n = 28), followed by combined results from multiple surgical subspecialties (n = 15) and colorectal surgery (n = 13). The majority of manuscripts featured case series/reports (n = 42), followed by comparative studies (n = 24). The most cited paper authored by Nelson et al. (432 citations) reviewed technological advances in the field. The year and country with the greatest number of publications were 2009 (n = 15) and the USA (n = 68). The Johns Hopkins University published the most top 100 manuscripts (n = 18). The 100 most cited manuscripts reflect the progression of robotic surgery from a basic instrument-holding platform to today's articulated instruments with 3D technology. From feasibility studies to multicenter trials, this analysis demonstrates how robotic assisted surgery has gained acceptance in urological, colorectal, general, cardiothoracic, orthopedic, maxillofacial and neuro surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30949890What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.