ArticleJournal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO2019
Evaluating Psychophysical Polarity Sensitivity as an Indirect Estimate of Neural Status in Cochlear Implant Listeners.
Article in Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed.
- Establishing reliable neural health measures in adult cochlear implant users.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Cochlear-implant simulated spectral degradation attenuates emotional responses to environmental sounds.International journal of audiology · 2025Article
- Model-Based Inference of Electrode Distance and Neuronal Density from Measured Detection Thresholds in Cochlear Implant Listeners.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2025Article
- Polarity sensitivity to symmetric, biphasic monopolar pulses is not a reliable indicator of peripheral axonal degeneration in human cochlear implant users.Frontiers in audiology and otology · 2025Article
- Effects of selective stimulation of apical electrodes on temporal pitch perception by cochlear implant recipients.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2024Article
- Editorial: Views on JARO 2023.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2024Article
- Electrically evoked compound action potential polarity sensitivity, refractory-recovery, and behavioral multi-pulse integration as potential indices of neural health in cochlear-implant recipients.Hearing research · 2023Article
- Cochlear Health and Cochlear-implant Function.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2023Review
- Factors influencing the relationship between cochlear health measures and speech recognition in cochlear implant users.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2023Article
- Assessing the Relationship Between Pitch Perception and Neural Health in Cochlear Implant Users.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2022Article
- Changes in the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential over time After Implantation and Subsequent Deafening in Guinea Pigs.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2022Article
- Characterizing Polarity Sensitivity in Cochlear Implant Recipients: Demographic Effects and Potential Implications for Estimating Neural Health.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2022Article
- Estimating health of the implanted cochlea using psychophysical strength-duration functions and electrode configuration.Hearing research · 2022Article
- Cochlear Implant Research and Development in the Twenty-first Century: A Critical Update.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2021Review
- Recovery from forward masking in cochlear implant listeners: Effects of age and the electrode-neuron interface.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2021Article
- Evaluating and Comparing Behavioural and Electrophysiological Estimates of Neural Health in Cochlear Implant Users.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2021Article
- Polarity Sensitivity of Human Auditory Nerve Fibers Based on Pulse Shape, Cochlear Implant Stimulation Strategy and Array.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
- Article
- Cochlear implants and other inner ear prostheses: today and tomorrow.Current opinion in physiology · 2020Article
- Effect of the Relative Timing between Same-Polarity Pulses on Thresholds and Loudness in Cochlear Implant Users.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The physiological integrity of spiral ganglion neurons is presumed to influence cochlear implant (CI) outcomes, but it is difficult to measure neural health in CI listeners. Modeling data suggest that, when peripheral processes have degenerated, anodic stimulation may be a more effective neural stimulus than cathodic stimulation. The primary goal of the present study was to evaluate the emerging theory that polarity sensitivity reflects neural health in CI listeners. An ideal in vivo estimate of neural integrity should vary independently of other factors known to influence the CI electrode-neuron interface, such as electrode position and tissue impedances. Thus, the present analyses quantified the relationships between polarity sensitivity and (1) electrode position estimated via computed tomography imaging, (2) intracochlear resistance estimated via electrical field imaging, and (3) focused (steered quadrupolar) behavioral thresholds, which are believed to reflect a combination of local neural health, electrode position, and intracochlear resistance. Eleven adults with Advanced Bionics devices participated. To estimate polarity sensitivity, electrode-specific behavioral thresholds in response to monopolar, triphasic pulses where the central high-amplitude phase was either anodic (CAC) or cathodic (ACA) were measured. The polarity effect was defined as the difference in threshold response to the ACA compared to the CAC stimulus. Results indicated that the polarity effect was not related to electrode-to-modiolus distance, electrode scalar location, or intracochlear resistance. Large, positive polarity effects, which may indicate SGN degeneration, were associated with relatively high focused behavioral thresholds. The polarity effect explained a significant portion of the variation in focused thresholds, even after controlling for electrode position and intracochlear resistance. Overall, these results provide support for the theory that the polarity effect may reflect neural integrity in CI listeners. Evidence from this study supports further investigation into the use of polarity sensitivity for optimizing individual CI programming parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.