ReviewHeart failure reviews2019
Novel percutaneous interventional therapies in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: an integrative review.
Review in Heart failure reviews, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Improving hydraulic performance of the left atrial assist device using computational fluid dynamics.Artificial organs · 2025Article
- Advances in device-based treatment of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: evidence from clinical trials.ESC heart failure · 2024Review
- Large animal models to study effectiveness of therapy devices in the treatment of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).Heart failure reviews · 2024Review
- Left atrial assist device for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: initial results with torque control mode in diastolic heart failure model.Heart failure reviews · 2023Review
- Can mechanical circulatory support be an effective treatment for HFpEF patients?Heart failure reviews · 2023Review
- Large animal models of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.Heart failure reviews · 2022Review
- Novel approaches for left atrial pressure relief: Device-based monitoring and management in heart failure.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
- Device-based treatment options for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.Heart failure reviews · 2021Review
- Adverse Cardiac Remodelling after Acute Myocardial Infarction: Old and New Biomarkers.Disease markers · 2020 · on this mapReview
- Device-Based Solutions to Improve Cardiac Physiology and Hemodynamics in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.JACC. Basic to translational scienceReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a common disorder generating high mortality and important morbidity prevalence, with a very limited medical treatment available. Studies have shown that the pathophysiological hallmark of this condition is an elevated left intra-atrial pressure (LAP), exertional dyspnea being its clinical manifestation. The increasing pressure from LA is not based on volume overload (such as in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction) but on a diastolic left ventricular (LV) dysfunction combined with an inter-atrial dyssynchrony mimicking a pseudo-pacemaker syndrome. In this review, we aimed to summarize current knowledge and discuss future directions of the newest interventional percutaneous therapies of HFpEF. Novel interventional approaches developed to counter these mechanisms are as follows: LA decompression (inter-atrial shunt devices), enhancement of LV compliance (LV expanders), and inter-atrial resynchronization therapy (LA permanent pacing). To date, inter-atrial shunt devices (IASD) are the most studied, being the only devices currently tested in a phase 3 trial. Recent data showed that IASD are feasible, safe, and have a short-term clinical benefit in HFpEF patients. LV expanders and LA pacing therapy present with a smaller clinical benefit compared with IASD, but they are safe, without any major adverse outcomes currently noted. With further development and improvement of these mechanism-specific devices, it will be interesting to determine in the future whether a complex intervention of multiple HFpEF device implantation will be safe and have further benefits in HFpEF patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.