Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30949848›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology reports2019

Anticoagulation of Cardiovascular Conditions in the Cancer Patient: Review of Old and New Therapies.

Isaac B Rhea, Alexander R Lyon, Michael G Fradley

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Cardiovascular Toxicities of Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors.Current treatment options in oncology · 2020
    Review
  11. Electrophysiology Translational Considerations in Cardio-Oncology: QT and Beyond.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Isaac B RheaCardio-Oncology Program, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, 12902 USF Magnolia Dr., MCB-CPT, Tampa, FL, 33612-9416, USA.
Alexander R LyonCardio-Oncology Service, London UK and National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK.
Michael G FradleyCardio-Oncology Program, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, 12902 USF Magnolia Dr., MCB-CPT, Tampa, FL, 33612-9416, USA. mfradley@health.usf.edu.
Moffitt Cancer Center · USRoyal Brompton Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe anticoagulation strategies for various cardiac-specific pathologies including atrial fibrillation are changing. Applying these strategies in patients with concomitant active cancer requires additional considerations. Here, we review the most recent changes in the anticoagulation management of common cardiac diseases and their application in cancer patients. RECENT

findingsThere are a range of indications for therapeutic anticoagulation in cancer patients including venous thromboembolism (VTE), atrial fibrillation/flutter (AF/AFL), prosthetic heart valves, and intracardiac thrombi. Certain cancer therapeutics such as ibrutinib and anthracycline chemotherapy increase the risk of developing AF/AFL and pose unique challenges in anticoagulation management. Anticoagulation decisions for AF/AFL often utilize the CHADS2 or the CHA2DS2-VASc score with annualized stroke risk; however, these risk stratification models may be inadequate in cancer patients. Cancer type, stage, prognosis, and bleeding risk are all relevant when considering whether to initiate therapeutic anticoagulation. Moreover, thrombocytopenia may limit the ability to provide anticoagulation. Subsequent analyses of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) show fewer bleeding complications and thromboembolic events compared to warfarin in AF/AFL with apixaban and edoxaban particularly promising in this population for VTE, pulmonary embolism, and AF/AFL. There is a lack of data regarding ablation therapy and left atrial occlusion devices in this population. There is a growing experience of DOACs for intracardiac thrombi. Warfarin is still appropriate for patients with prosthetic heart valves and left ventricular assist devices. Anticoagulation management in the cancer patient can be challenging. DOACs are often a safe alternative to warfarin in cancer-associated DVT/PE and AF/AFL, and may be preferable in certain circumstances. Other cardiac indications for anticoagulation including the presence of a mechanical heart valve remain unchanged and dependent on warfarin or heparin-based products.

Indexed as

AnticoagulantsAntineoplastic AgentsAtrial FibrillationAtrial FlutterCardiotoxicityCardiovascular DiseasesHeart Valve ProsthesisHumansNeoplasmsThrombosisAnticoagulantsAntineoplastic AgentsAnticoagulationAtrial fibrillationCancerCardio-oncology

Identifiers

PMID30949848
OpenAlexW2932170636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.