ReviewCurrent hypertension reports2019
Masked Hypertension: Whom and How to Screen?
Review in Current hypertension reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Control of Pulse Pressure and Factors Affecting it among the Geriatric Population Suffering from Hypertension within the Community.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Association of hypertension and long-term blood pressure changes with new-onset diabetes in the elderly: A 10-year cohort study.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2025Article
- [May Measurement Month 2019: Screening Analysis In Spanish Community Pharmacies and Detection of Masked Hypertension].Farmaceuticos comunitarios · 2023Article
- Estimation of Physiologic Pressures: Invasive and Non-Invasive Techniques, AI Models, and Future Perspectives.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- The Road to Implementing Home Blood Pressure Monitoring: Are We There Yet?American journal of hypertension · 2020Article
- Wide pulse pressure: A clinical review.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewTo review issues regarding the practical implementation of screening strategies for masked hypertension. RECENT
findingsMasked hypertension has been associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease events and all-cause mortality. Recent guidelines have encouraged practitioners to use out-of-clinic monitoring to detect masked hypertension in some situations. However, it is unclear from these guidelines who should be screened or how to best measure out-of-office blood pressure. In this review, challenges to screening strategies for masked hypertension, and factors that should be considered when deciding to screen using ambulatory or home blood pressure monitoring. Masked hypertension is an important clinical phenotype to detect. Future research is needed in order to develop optimal screening strategies, and to understand population level implications of using ambulatory or home blood pressure monitoring on blood pressure control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.