Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30949708›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2019

Prediction of lefamulin epithelial lining fluid penetration after intravenous and oral administration using Phase 1 data and population pharmacokinetics methods.

Li Zhang, Wolfgang W Wicha, Sujata M Bhavnani, Christopher M Rubino

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Lefamulin.Hospital pharmacy · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Spotlight on New Antibiotics for the Treatment of Pneumonia.Clinical medicine insights. Circulatory, respiratory and pulmonary medicine · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Li ZhangInstitute for Clinical Pharmacodynamics, Schenectady, NY, USA.
Wolfgang W WichaNabriva Therapeutics GmbH, Vienna, Austria.
Sujata M BhavnaniInstitute for Clinical Pharmacodynamics, Schenectady, NY, USA.
Christopher M RubinoInstitute for Clinical Pharmacodynamics, Schenectady, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesLefamulin is a semi-synthetic intravenous and oral pleuromutilin antibiotic with activity against pathogens commonly associated with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia. Using data from two Phase 1 studies, a population pharmacokinetics (PPK) model for lefamulin in plasma and epithelial lining fluid (ELF) was constructed.

methodsPlasma pharmacokinetic (PK) data from a crossover, bioavailability, food-effect study and plasma and ELF PK data from a tissue penetration study in normal healthy volunteers were used to construct a PPK model for lefamulin. Model development involved refinement of a previous PPK model for intravenous and oral administration, followed by application of the model to plasma and ELF data from the tissue penetration study. The ELF penetration ratio of lefamulin was determined using model-based simulations.

resultsThe PPK analysis data set contained 1103 plasma and 12 ELF lefamulin concentrations from 32 subjects. A three-compartment model with non-linear protein binding and two parallel absorption processes provided precise and unbiased estimated plasma concentration-time profiles. The absorption rate was slower and bioavailability was decreased after a high-fat/high-calorie meal. ELF data were well described using first-order rate constants into and out of the ELF compartment. The median predicted lefamulin total-drug ELF AUC0-24/free-drug plasma AUC0-24 ratio was ∼5:1 after intravenous or oral administration.

conclusionsThe final PPK model allowed precise characterization of plasma and ELF exposures after intravenous and oral administration. The high ELF penetration ratio suggests that the penetration of lefamulin into the effect site is rapid and extensive, irrespective of route of administration.

Indexed as

Administration, IntravenousAdministration, OralAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsBronchoalveolar Lavage FluidCross-Over StudiesDiterpenesEpitheliumFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, StatisticalPolycyclic CompoundsPredictive Value of TestsAnti-Bacterial AgentsDiterpeneslefamulinPolycyclic CompoundsTabletsThioglycolates

Identifiers

PMID30949708
PMCPMC6449575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.