ArticleNucleic acids research2019
A tunable assay for modulators of genome-destabilizing DNA structures.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- How DNA secondary structures drive replication fork instability.DNA repair · 2025Review
- Reconfigurable DNA triplex structure for pH responsive logic gates.RSC advances · 2023Article
- A 'light-up' intercalator displacement assay for detection of triplex DNA stabilizers.Chemical communications (Cambridge, England) · 2020Article
- Modulation of DNA structure formation using small molecules.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Molecular cell research · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Regions of genomic instability are not random and often co-localize with DNA sequences that can adopt alternative DNA structures (i.e. non-B DNA, such as H-DNA). Non-B DNA-forming sequences are highly enriched at translocation breakpoints in human cancer genomes, representing an endogenous source of genetic instability. However, a further understanding of the mechanisms involved in non-B DNA-induced genetic instability is needed. Small molecules that can modulate the formation/stability of non-B DNA structures, and therefore the subsequent mutagenic outcome, represent valuable tools to study DNA structure-induced genetic instability. To this end, we have developed a tunable Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based assay to detect triplex/H-DNA-destabilizing and -stabilizing ligands. The assay was designed by incorporating a fluorophore-quencher pair in a naturally-occurring H-DNA-forming sequence from a chromosomal breakpoint hotspot in the human c-MYC oncogene. By tuning triplex stability via buffer composition, the assay functions as a dual-reporter that can identify stabilizers and destabilizers, simultaneously. The assay principle was demonstrated using known triplex stabilizers, BePI and coralyne, and a complementary oligonucleotide to mimic a destabilizer, MCRa2. The potential of the assay was validated in a 384-well plate with 320 custom-assembled compounds. The discovery of novel triplex stabilizers/destabilizers may allow the regulation of genetic instability in human genomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.