Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30949592›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational radiation oncology2019

The GIRAFE phase II trial on MVCT-based "volumes of the day" and "dose of the day" addresses when and how to implement adaptive radiotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer.

Vincent Esteyrie, Baptiste Gleyzolle, Amélie Lusque, Pierre Graff, Anouchka Modesto, Michel Rives, Michel Lapeyre, Jacques Desrousseaux, Eliane Graulières, Gregory Hangard and 7 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03953352 (Evaluation of the Automatic Deformable Recontouring on the Daily MVCT for Head and Neck Cancer Adaptive Radiotherapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03953352 nawithdrawnnot on this map

Evaluation of the Automatic Deformable Recontouring on the Daily MVCT for Head and Neck Cancer Adaptive Radiotherapy

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstitut Claudius RegaudRan2019 to 2021Enrolled0ConditionsHead and Neck CancerArmsHelical intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Adaptive radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.Cancers of the head & neck · 2020
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Vincent EsteyrieRadiation Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse, Oncopole, Toulouse, France.
Baptiste GleyzolleRadiation Oncology, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Amélie LusqueBiostatistics Unit, Institut Claudius Regaud-, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse - Oncopole Toulouse, France.
Pierre GraffRadiation Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse, Oncopole, Toulouse, France.
Anouchka ModestoRadiation Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse, Oncopole, Toulouse, France.
Michel RivesRadiation Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse, Oncopole, Toulouse, France.
Michel LapeyreRadiation Oncology, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Jacques DesrousseauxRadiation Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse, Oncopole, Toulouse, France.
Eliane GraulièresEngineering and Medical Physics, Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse - Oncopole. Toulouse, France.
Gregory HangardEngineering and Medical Physics, Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse - Oncopole. Toulouse, France.
François-Xavier ArnaudEngineering and Medical Physics, Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse - Oncopole. Toulouse, France.
Regis FerrandEngineering and Medical Physics, Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse - Oncopole. Toulouse, France.
Jean-Pierre DelordClinical Trials Office , Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse - Oncopole. Toulouse, France.
Muriel PoublancClinical Trials Office , Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse - Oncopole. Toulouse, France.
Muriel MounierClinical Trials Office , Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse - Oncopole. Toulouse, France.
Thomas FilleronBiostatistics Unit, Institut Claudius Regaud-, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse - Oncopole Toulouse, France.
Anne LaprieRadiation Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse, Oncopole, Toulouse, France.
Institut Claudius Regaud · FRCentre Jean Perrin · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During exclusive curative radiotherapy for head and neck tumors, the patient's organs at risk (OAR) and target volumes frequently change size and shape, leading to a risk of higher toxicity and lower control than expected on planned dosimetry. Adaptive radiotherapy is often necessary but 1) tools are needed to define the optimal time for replanning, and 2) the subsequent workflow is time-consuming. We designed a prospective study to evaluate 1) the validity of automatically deformed contours on the daily MVCT, in order to safely use the "dose-of the day" tool to check daily if replanning is necessary; 2) the automatically deformed contours on the replanning CT and the time gained in the replanning workflow. Forty-eight patients with T3-T4 and/or involved node >2 cm head and neck squamous cell carcinomas, planned for curative radiotherapy without surgery, will be enrolled. They will undergo treatment with helical IMRT including daily repositioning MVCTs. The contours proposed will be compared weekly on intermediate planning CTs (iCTs) on weeks 3, 4, 5 and 6. On these iCTs both manual recontouring and automated deformable registration of the initial contours will be compared with the contours automatically defined on the MVCT. The primary objective is to evaluate the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of the volumes of each parotid gland. The secondary objectives will evaluate, for target volumes and all OARs: the DSC, the mean distance to agreement, and the average surface-to-surface distance. Time between the automatic and the manual recontouring workflows will be compared.

Indexed as

ART, adaptive radiotherapyCT, computed tomographyCTV, clinical target volumeDIR, deformable image registrationDSC, Dice similarity coefficientGTV, gross tumor volumeH&N, head and neckICRU, international commission on radiation units and measurementsiCT, intermediate computed tomographyIGRT, image-guided radiotherapyIMRT, intensity-modulated radiotherapyIUCT, Institut Universitaire du cancer de ToulouseMVCT, megavoltage computed tomographyOAR, organ at riskPET, positron emission tomographyPTV, planning target volume

Identifiers

PMID30949592
PMCPMC6429538
OpenAlexW2922309635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.