Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30949489›Full record

ArticleERJ open research2019

The characterisation of interstitial lung disease multidisciplinary team meetings: a global study.

Luca Richeldi, Naomi Launders, Fernando Martinez, Simon L F Walsh, Jeffrey Myers, Bonnie Wang, Mark Jones, Alison Chisholm, Kevin R Flaherty

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ERJ open research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Towards the adoption of quantitative computed tomography in the management of interstitial lung disease.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Multidisciplinary teams in the clinical care of fibrotic interstitial lung disease: current perspectives.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Luca RicheldiUnità Operativa Complessa di Pneumologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Naomi LaundersRespiratory Effectiveness Group, Cambridge, UK.
Fernando MartinezJoan and Sanford I. Weill Dept of Medicine, New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Simon L F WalshDept of Radiology, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK.
Jeffrey MyersDept of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Bonnie WangDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Dept of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Mark JonesNIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Alison ChisholmRespiratory Effectiveness Group, Cambridge, UK.
Kevin R FlahertyDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Dept of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITNewYork–Presbyterian Hospital · USNIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre · GBRoyal Brompton Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multidisciplinary team (MDT) diagnosis of interstitial lung disease (ILD) has been proposed as a gold standard, but there are no formal recommendations for MDT process or composition and limited knowledge regarding prevalence in routine practice. We performed a systematic evaluation of ILD diagnostic practice across a range of healthcare settings around the world. Electronic questionnaires were distributed across all global regions

Identifiers

PMID30949489
PMCPMC6441673
OpenAlexW2934499228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.