Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30949308›Full record

ArticleJournal of extracellular vesicles2019

Optimisation of imaging flow cytometry for the analysis of single extracellular vesicles by using fluorescence-tagged vesicles as biological reference material.

André Görgens, Michel Bremer, Rita Ferrer-Tur, Florian Murke, Tobias Tertel, Peter A Horn, Sebastian Thalmann, Joshua A Welsh, Christine Probst, Coralié Guerin and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of extracellular vesicles, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 190 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
190citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

190 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

130 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

André GörgensInstitute for Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9198-0857
Michel BremerInstitute for Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Rita Ferrer-TurInstitute for Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Florian MurkeInstitute for Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Tobias TertelInstitute for Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Peter A HornInstitute for Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Sebastian ThalmannLuminex B.V., 's-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands.
Joshua A WelshTranslational Nanobiology Section, Laboratory of Pathology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1097-9756
Christine ProbstAmnis/Luminex, Seattle, WA, USA.
Coralié GuerinParis Descartes University, Paris, France.
Chantal M BoulangerParis Descartes University, Paris, France.
Jennifer C JonesTranslational Nanobiology Section, Laboratory of Pathology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9488-7719
Helmut HanenbergDepartment of Pediatrics III, University Children's Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Uta ErdbrüggerDepartment of Medicine, Nephrology Division, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Joanne LanniganFlow Cytometry Core, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Franz L RicklefsDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Samir El-AndaloussiDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Research Center, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Bernd GiebelInstitute for Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.

Funding

Development and use of nanoFACS for analysis and sorting of nanoparticlesZIABC011502 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI JONES, JENNIFER · 2013 to 2025
$8.6M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) mediate targeted cellular interactions in normal and pathophysiological conditions and are increasingly recognised as potential biomarkers, therapeutic agents and drug delivery vehicles. Based on their size and biogenesis, EVs are classified as exosomes, microvesicles and apoptotic bodies. Due to overlapping size ranges and the lack of specific markers, these classes cannot yet be distinguished experimentally. Currently, it is a major challenge in the field to define robust and sensitive technological platforms being suitable to resolve EV heterogeneity, especially for small EVs (sEVs) with diameters below 200 nm, i.e. smaller microvesicles and exosomes. Most conventional flow cytometers are not suitable for the detection of particles being smaller than 300 nm, and the poor availability of defined reference materials hampers the validation of sEV analysis protocols. Following initial reports that imaging flow cytometry (IFCM) can be used for the characterisation of larger EVs, we aimed to investigate its usability for the characterisation of sEVs. This study set out to identify optimal sample preparation and instrument settings that would demonstrate the utility of this technology for the detection of single sEVs. By using CD63eGFP-labelled sEVs as a biological reference material, we were able to define and optimise IFCM acquisition and analysis parameters on an Amnis ImageStreamX MkII instrument for the detection of single sEVs. In addition, using antibody-labelling approaches, we show that IFCM facilitates robust detection of different EV and sEV subpopulations in isolated EVs, as well as unprocessed EV-containing samples. Our results indicate that fluorescently labelled sEVs as biological reference material are highly useful for the optimisation of fluorescence-based methods for sEV analysis. Finally, we propose that IFCM will help to significantly increase our ability to assess EV heterogeneity in a rigorous and reproducible manner, and facilitate the identification of specific subsets of sEVs as useful biomarkers in various diseases.

Indexed as

CD63exosomesExtracellular vesiclesflow cytometryimaging flow cytometrymicrovesiclesreference materialstandardisationsubmicron particle analysis

Identifiers

PMID30949308
PMCPMC6442110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.