Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30949233›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of mental health systems2019

The resource group method in severe mental illness: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial and a qualitative multiple case study.

Cathelijn D Tjaden, Cornelis L Mulder, Jaap van Weeghel, Philippe Delespaul, Rene Keet, Stynke Castelein, Jenny Boumans, Eva Leeman, Ulf Malm, Hans Kroon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of mental health systems, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Cathelijn D Tjaden1Department of Reintegration and Community Care, Trimbos Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9326-5600
Cornelis L Mulder2Department of Psychiatry, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Jaap van Weeghel4Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tranzo Scientific Center for Care and Welfare, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Philippe Delespaul6School of Mental Health and NeuroSciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Rene Keet8Department of Community Mental Health, GGZ Noord-Holland-Noord, Heiloo, The Netherlands.
Stynke Castelein9Lentis Research, Lentis Psychiatric Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Jenny Boumans1Department of Reintegration and Community Care, Trimbos Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Eva Leeman3Antes, Parnassia Psychiatric Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Ulf Malm12Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Hans Kroon1Department of Reintegration and Community Care, Trimbos Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe resource group method provides a structure to facilitate patients' empowerment and recovery processes, and to systematically engage significant others in treatment and care. A patient chooses members of a resource group (RG) that will work together on fulfilling patients' recovery plan. By adopting shared decision-making processes and stimulating collaboration of different support systems, a broad and continuous support of patients' chosen goals and wishes is preserved and problem solving and communication skills of the RG members are addressed.

objectiveThe objectives of this study are (1) to establish the effectiveness of the RG method in increasing empowerment in patients with severe mental illnesses (SMI) in the Netherlands; (2) to investigate the cost-effectiveness and cost utility of the RG method; and (3) to qualitatively explore its dynamics and processes. METHODS/

designThis multisite randomized controlled trial will compare the effects of the RG-method integrated in Flexible Assertive Community Treatment (FACT) (90 patients) with those of standard FACT (90 patients). Baseline assessments and 9-month and 18-month follow-up assessments will be conducted in face-to-face home visits. The primary outcome measure, empowerment, will be assessed using the Netherlands Empowerment List (NEL). The secondary outcomes will be quality of life (MANSA); personal, community and clinical recovery (I.ROC); general, social and community functioning (WHODAS 2.0); general psychopathological signs and symptoms (BSI-18); and societal costs (TiC-P). An economic evaluation of the cost-effectiveness and cost utility of the RG method will also be conducted. A qualitative multiple case-study will be added to collect patients', RG members' and professionals' perspectives by in-depth interviews, observations and focus groups. DISCUSSION: This trial will be the first to study the effects of the RG method on empowerment in patients with SMI. By combining clinical-effectiveness data with an economic evaluation and in-depth qualitative information from primary stakeholders, it will provide a detailed overview of the RG method as a mean of improving care for patients with SMI.

Indexed as

Care structureCommunity mental healthEmpowermentFamilyFamily intervention(Flexible) Assertive Community TreatmentRACTRecoveryResource groupSevere mental illness

Identifiers

PMID30949233
PMCPMC6429834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.