ArticlePaediatrics & child health2019
Stakeholder feedback on The CARD™ System to improve the vaccination experience at school.
Article in Paediatrics & child health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- "It Could Become a Standard"-A Qualitative Study of the CARDChildren (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Digital health solutions for caregivers of children experiencing acute pain: a scoping review.Pain reports · 2025Review
- Stakeholders' experiences with school-based immunization programs during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Canadian Maritimes: A qualitative study.Public health in practice (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- A Behavioral analysis of nurses' and pharmacists' role in addressing vaccine hesitancy: scoping review.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2021Article
- Student Feedback to Tailor the CARD™ System for Improving the Immunization Experience at School.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Piloting The CARD™ System for education of students about vaccination: Does it improve the vaccination experience at school?Paediatrics & child health · 2019Article
- Pain Pain Go Away: Improving the vaccination experience at school.Paediatrics & child health · 2019Article
- The CARD™ System for improving the vaccination experience at school: Results of a small-scale implementation project on student symptoms.Paediatrics & child health · 2019Article
- The CARD™ System for improving the vaccination experience at school: Results of a small-scale implementation project on program delivery.Paediatrics & child health · 2019Article
- Involving stakeholders in informing the development of a Knowledge Translation (KT) intervention to improve the vaccination experience at school.Paediatrics & child health · 2019Article
- Overview of a Knowledge Translation (KT) Project to improve the vaccination experience at school: The CARD™ System.Paediatrics & child health · 2019Article
- Community pharmacists' perceptions of the CARD (Comfort Ask Relax Distract) system for use during vaccinations.Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPCArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveSchool-based vaccination programs can be a source of distress for many students due to the pain from the needle injection and related fears. We created a multifaceted Knowledge Translation (KT) intervention to address vaccination and pain, fear, and fainting called The CARD™ System. The objectives were to document acceptability of key tools included in the multifaceted KT intervention and their effectiveness in improving knowledge and attitudes about vaccination pain and fear.
methodsQuantitative and qualitative methods were used. Students, school staff, public health nurses, and parents participated in separate focus groups whereby they independently completed a knowledge and attitudes survey and provided structured and qualitative feedback on key KT tools of the multifaceted KT intervention. They then repeated the knowledge and attitudes survey.
resultsAltogether, 22 students (grade 6 and 7), 16 school staff (principals, grade 7 and 8 teachers, resource teachers, secretaries), 10 nurses (injecting, charge, and school nurses), and 3 parents participated. Knowledge test scores increased post-KT tool review: 8.5 (2.1) versus 7.3 (1.9); P<0.001. Attitudes were more positive about the individual nature of pain and fear experience during vaccination. Student fear scores were lower post-tool review: 5.1 (2.9) versus 4.6 (3.0); P<0.001. The majority of the participants reported they understood all the information, the amount was just right and that the information was useful. DISCUSSION: The KT tools were demonstrated to be acceptable and to improve knowledge. Future research is warranted to determine their impact on student experience during school vaccinations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.