Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30948890›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of surgical oncology2019

En Bloc Resection with Partial Sacrectomy Helps to Achieve R0 Resection in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer, Experience from a Tertiary Cancer Center.

Nizamudheen M Pareekutty, Satheesan Balasubramanian, Sachin Kadam, Dipin Jayaprakash, Basavaraj Ankalkoti, Sangeetha Nayanar, Geetha Muttath, Bindu Anilkumar

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of surgical oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nizamudheen M Pareekutty1Department of Surgical Oncology, Malabar Cancer Center, Moozhikkara (PO), Thalassery, Kannur district, Kerala 670103 India.
Satheesan Balasubramanian1Department of Surgical Oncology, Malabar Cancer Center, Moozhikkara (PO), Thalassery, Kannur district, Kerala 670103 India.
Sachin Kadam1Department of Surgical Oncology, Malabar Cancer Center, Moozhikkara (PO), Thalassery, Kannur district, Kerala 670103 India.
Dipin Jayaprakash1Department of Surgical Oncology, Malabar Cancer Center, Moozhikkara (PO), Thalassery, Kannur district, Kerala 670103 India.
Basavaraj Ankalkoti1Department of Surgical Oncology, Malabar Cancer Center, Moozhikkara (PO), Thalassery, Kannur district, Kerala 670103 India.
Sangeetha Nayanar2Department of Radiation Oncology, Malabar Cancer Center, Moozhikkara (PO), Thalassery, Kannur district, Kerala 670103 India.
Geetha Muttath3Department of Pathology, Malabar Cancer Center, Moozhikkara (PO), Thalassery, Kannur district, Kerala 670103 India.
Bindu Anilkumar4Department of Cancer Registry and Biostatistics, Malabar Cancer Center, Moozhikkara (PO), Thalassery, Kannur district, Kerala 670103 India.
Malabar Cancer Centre · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Partial sacrectomy is a radical procedure that benefits a select group of patients with locally advanced primary or recurrent rectal cancer with posterior extension and carries potential for significant morbidity. This study was done to evaluate the morbidity and oncological outcome of patients who underwent partial sacral resection for rectal cancer in a tertiary cancer center. Seventeen patients underwent partial sacrectomy during the period from 2011 to 2015. Eleven patients had primary and six had recurrent rectal cancer. All patients were evaluated with MRI pelvis and metastatic evaluation with CT scan of the chest and abdomen and PET scan in patients with recurrent cancer. All patients had resection below the level of S2/S3 junction or lower. Three patients were females and the remaining were males. Median age was 56 years. Overall morbidity was 76% and most common morbidity was wound related. The mean estimated relapse-free survival (RFS) for patients treated for primary rectal cancer was 20.3 months (95% confidence interval (CI), 12.8-27.9) and the mean estimated overall survival (OS) 23.9 months. Estimated mean RFS for patients who were operated for recurrent rectal cancer was 25.6 months (95% CI, 17.7-33.5) and the median RFS was yet to reach. Estimated mean OS was 29.7 months (95% CI, 15.5-43.8) and the median OS was 39.6 months. Partial sacrectomy below the level of S2/S3 junction is a safe approach to facilitate en bloc resection of locally advanced primary and recurrent rectal cancer extending posteriorly with loss of plane with sacrum. In selected patients, this approach can improve survival at the cost of high morbidity.

Indexed as

En bloc resectionPartial sacrectomyRectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID30948890
PMCPMC6414555
OpenAlexW2910770662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.