Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30948876›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of surgical oncology2019

Rate of Breast-Conserving Surgery vs Mastectomy in Breast Cancer: a Tertiary Care Centre Experience from South India.

Shaziya Hassan Ali, Somashekhar S P, Arun Kumar N

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of surgical oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Determinants of Patient Delay among Women with Carcinoma Breast.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Breast conservation surgery & oncoplasty in India - Current scenario.The Indian journal of medical research · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shaziya Hassan Ali1Department of Surgical Oncology, Manipal Comprehensive Cancer Center, Manipal University, HAL Airport Road, Bengaluru, Karnataka 560017 India.ORCID 0000-0002-9909-8305
Somashekhar S PDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Manipal Comprehensive Cancer Center, HAL Airport Road, Bengaluru, Karnataka 560017 India.
Arun Kumar NManipal Comprehensive Cancer Center, HAL Airport Road, Bengaluru, Karnataka 560017 India.
Manipal Hospital · INManipal Academy of Higher Education · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Worldwide, breast conservation has become increasingly accepted as the surgical management of breast cancer in clinical practice. Cancer care in India is also evolving tremendously with many cancer treatment centres following evidence-based practice hence the rates of breast conservation are expected to increase. Here, we are reporting the rate of breast-conserving surgery (BCS) at our centre. A retrospective study of 401 patients who underwent breast cancer surgery at a tertiary care centre in South India from January 2015 to August 2017 were analysed to study the rate of BCS. All early breast cancers (EBC) were offered BCS. For large operable breast cancer (LOBC) and locally advanced breast cancer (LABC), neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by BCS was offered to these patients who wish to conserve their breast. The mean age was 45 years. A total of 163 patients underwent BCS. Yearly, BCS rates were 38.8% in 2015, 36.7% in 2016 and 46.5% in 2017. Majority had EBC 310 (77.3%) of which 62.7% of T1 lesions (

Indexed as

Breast-conserving surgeryEarly breast cancerNeoadjuvant chemotherapyRates

Identifiers

PMID30948876
PMCPMC6414564
OpenAlexW2896369317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.