Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30948822›Full record

SynthesisHypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension2019

Optimal blood pressure targets for patients with hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Atsushi Sakima, Hiroshi Satonaka, Norifumi Nishida, Keisuke Yatsu, Hisatomi Arima

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Evaluating blood pressure targets in chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. The Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension (JSH 2019).Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2019
    Guideline
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. The Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the management of elevated blood pressure and hypertension 2025 (JSH2025).Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Hypertension paradox in Japan: the road ahead.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Annual reports on hypertension research 2020.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Atsushi SakimaHealth Administration Center, University of the Ryukyus, Nishihara, Japan. asakima@med.u-ryukyu.ac.jp.
Hiroshi SatonakaDepartment of Cardiology and Nephrology, Dokkyo Medical University, Mibu, Japan.
Norifumi NishidaDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan.
Keisuke YatsuDepartment of Medical Science and Cardiorenal Medicine, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Hisatomi ArimaDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Dokkyo Medical University · JPFukuoka University · JPKurume University · JPUniversity of the Ryukyus · JPYokohama City University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optimal blood pressure (BP) targets for hypertension have been an important clinical issue but have been elusive. The Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) showed significant benefits of intensive BP-lowering treatment with a target systolic BP level of < 120 mm Hg on major cardiovascular (CV) events and mortality, whereas there was a modest increase in renal events related to BP-lowering treatment. We searched the PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, and ICHUSHI databases for randomized trials that assigned participants to intensive versus usual BP-lowering treatment with different BP targets. The outcomes were major CV events, all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, renal events, and adverse events. Nineteen trials that enrolled a total of 55,529 participants with a mean follow-up duration ranging from 1.6 to 12.2 years were included in the present analysis. There was a significant reduction in major CV events, myocardial infarction, and stroke and a trend toward a reduction in heart failure associated with intensive BP-lowering treatment, but no differences in the risks of all-cause death, renal events, or adverse events were observed between the randomized groups. Subgroup analyses indicated that intensive BP-lowering treatment with a target of < 130/80 mm Hg and/or achievement of BP < 130/80 mm Hg were associated with a significant reduction in major CV events compared with the usual group. In conclusion, intensive BP-lowering treatment reduces the risk of CV events. A target BP level of < 130/80 mm Hg appears to be optimal for CV protection in patients with hypertension.

Indexed as

Antihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureBlood Pressure DeterminationGoalsHumansHypertensionAntihypertensive AgentsAchieved blood pressureBlood pressure targetCardiovascular eventsMeta-analysisRandomized trialSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID30948822
OpenAlexW2926556377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.