ArticleNature2019
Publisher Correction: DNA sequencing at 40: past, present and future.
Article in Nature, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A decade of whole-exome sequencing in Brazilian Neurology: from past insights to future perspectives.Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria · 2025Review
- New Opportunities to Advance the Field of Sports Nutrition.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2022Review
- Psi-Caller: A Lightweight Short Read-Based Variant Caller With High Speed and Accuracy.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum for
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this Review, the year of publication of reference 54 should be 2005, not 2015. In Box 2, "1982: GenBank ( https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/statistics/ )" should read "1982: Genbank/ENA/DDBJ" and "2007: NCBI Short Read Archive" should read "2007: NCBI and ENA Short Read Archives"; this is because the launches of these American, European and Japanese databases were coordinated. These errors have not been corrected.
Identifiers
30948799What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.