ArticleScientific reports2019
A novel generic dictionary-based denoising method for improving noisy and densely packed nuclei segmentation in 3D time-lapse fluorescence microscopy images.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dynamic Mode Decomposition of Multiphoton and Stimulated Emission Depletion Microscopy Data for Analysis of Fluorescent Probes in Cellular Membranes.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- The role of cell-matrix adhesion and cell migration in breast tumor growth and progression.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024Article
- Applications and Advances of Multicellular Tumor Spheroids: Challenges in Their Development and Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Time-lapse fluorescence microscopy is an essential technique for quantifying various characteristics of cellular processes, i.e. cell survival, migration, and differentiation. To perform high-throughput quantification of cellular processes, nuclei segmentation and tracking should be performed in an automated manner. Nevertheless, nuclei segmentation and tracking are challenging tasks due to embedded noise, intensity inhomogeneity, shape variation as well as a weak boundary of nuclei. Although several nuclei segmentation approaches have been reported in the literature, dealing with embedded noise remains the most challenging part of any segmentation algorithm. We propose a novel denoising algorithm, based on sparse coding, that can both enhance very faint and noisy nuclei signal but simultaneously detect nuclei position accurately. Furthermore our method is based on a limited number of parameters, with only one being critical, which is the approximate size of the objects of interest. We also show that our denoising method coupled with classical segmentation method works properly in the context of the most challenging cases. To evaluate the performance of the proposed method, we tested our method on two datasets from the cell tracking challenge. Across all datasets, the proposed method achieved satisfactory results with 96:96% recall for the C. elegans dataset. Besides, in the Drosophila dataset, our method achieved very high recall (99:3%).
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.