Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30948645›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019

Mechanism mediated by a noncoding RNA, nc886, in the cytotoxicity of a DNA-reactive compound.

Nawapol Kunkeaw, Yeon-Su Lee, Wonkyun Ronny Im, Jiyoung Joan Jang, Min-Ji Song, Bobae Yang, Jong-Lyul Park, Seon-Young Kim, Yongsuk Ku, Yoosik Kim and 9 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Non-coding 886 (Epigenetics · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Human Vault RNAs: Exploring Their Potential Role in Cellular Metabolism.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Are We Studying Non-Coding RNAs Correctly? Lessons from nc886.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. LncRNAs in the Type I Interferon Antiviral Response.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 9 institutions in 3 countries.

Nawapol KunkeawDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555-1072.
Yeon-Su LeeRare Cancer Branch, Research Institute, National Cancer Center, 10408 Goyang, Korea.
Wonkyun Ronny ImDepartment of Cancer Biomedical Science, Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, 10408 Goyang, Korea.
Jiyoung Joan JangDepartment of Cancer Biomedical Science, Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, 10408 Goyang, Korea.
Min-Ji SongDepartment of Environmental Medical Biology, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 03722 Seoul, Korea.
Bobae YangDepartment of Environmental Medical Biology, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 03722 Seoul, Korea.
Jong-Lyul ParkPersonalized Genomic Medicine Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience & Biotechnology, 34141 Daejeon, Korea.
Seon-Young KimPersonalized Genomic Medicine Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience & Biotechnology, 34141 Daejeon, Korea.
Yongsuk KuDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering and KAIST Institute for Health Science and Technology, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, 34141 Daejeon, Korea.
Yoosik KimDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering and KAIST Institute for Health Science and Technology, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, 34141 Daejeon, Korea.
Sangmin KangDepartment of Cancer Biomedical Science, Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, 10408 Goyang, Korea.
Hye-Ram JoDivision of Radiation Biomedical Research, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, 01812 Seoul, Korea.
Jae-Hoon JeongDivision of Radiation Biomedical Research, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, 01812 Seoul, Korea.
Hyun-Sung LeeDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030.ORCID 0000-0001-8259-046X
Ju-Seog LeeDepartment of Systems Biology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030.
Hyoung-Pyo KimDepartment of Environmental Medical Biology, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 03722 Seoul, Korea.
Betty H JohnsonDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555-1072.
In-Hoo KimDepartment of Cancer Biomedical Science, Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, 10408 Goyang, Korea; ikim@ncc.re.kr yslee@ncc.re.kr.
Yong Sun LeeDepartment of Cancer Biomedical Science, Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, 10408 Goyang, Korea; ikim@ncc.re.kr yslee@ncc.re.kr.ORCID 0000-0001-9689-3410
National Cancer Center · KRYonsei University · KRKorea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology · KRKorea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences · KRKorea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology · KRBaylor College of Medicine · USMahidol University · THThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USThe University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA-reactive compounds are harnessed for cancer chemotherapy. Their genotoxic effects are considered to be the main mechanism for the cytotoxicity to date. Because this mechanism preferentially affects actively proliferating cells, it is postulated that the cytotoxicity is specific to cancer cells. Nonetheless, they do harm normal quiescent cells, suggesting that there are other cytotoxic mechanisms to be uncovered. By employing doxorubicin as a representative DNA-reactive compound, we have discovered a cytotoxic mechanism that involves a cellular noncoding RNA (ncRNA) nc886 and protein kinase R (PKR) that is a proapoptotic protein. nc886 is transcribed by RNA polymerase III (Pol III), binds to PKR, and prevents it from aberrant activation in most normal cells. We have shown here that doxorubicin evicts Pol III from DNA and, thereby, shuts down nc886 transcription. Consequently, the instantaneous depletion of nc886 provokes PKR and leads to apoptosis. In a short-pulse treatment of doxorubicin, these events are the main cause of cytotoxicity preceding the DNA damage response in a 3D culture system as well as the monolayer cultures. By identifying nc886 as a molecular signal for PKR to sense doxorubicin, we have provided an explanation for the conundrum why DNA-damaging drugs can be cytotoxic to quiescent cells that have the competent nc886/PKR pathway.

Indexed as

RNA, UntranslatedApoptosisCell LineDNADoxorubicineIF-2 KinaseHumansMicroRNAsRNA Polymerase IIISignal TransductionDNADoxorubicinEIF2AK2 protein, humaneIF-2 KinaseMicroRNAsMIRN886 microRNA, humanRNA Polymerase IIIRNA, Untranslatedcytotoxicitydoxorubicinnc886protein kinase RRNA polymerase III

Identifiers

PMID30948645
PMCPMC6486756
OpenAlexW2929482362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.