Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30948602›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Determinants of undergoing thyroid cancer screening in Korean women: a cross-sectional analysis from the K-Stori 2016.

Ha Na Cho, Eunji Choi, Da Hea Seo, Boyoung Park, Sohee Park, Juhee Cho, Sue Kim, Yeong-Ran Park, Yumie Rhee, Kui Son Choi

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ha Na ChoGraduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea (the Republic of).
Eunji ChoiGraduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea (the Republic of).
Da Hea SeoDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Inha University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea (the Republic of).
Boyoung ParkCollege of Medicine, Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea (the Republic of).ORCID 0000-0003-1902-3184
Sohee ParkGraduate School of Public Health, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea (the Republic of).
Juhee ChoDepartment of Clinical Research and Evaluation, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea (the Republic of).
Sue KimCollege of Nursing, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea (the Republic of).
Yeong-Ran ParkDivision of Silver Industry, Kangnam University, Yongin, Korea (the Republic of).
Yumie RheeDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (the Republic of).
Kui Son ChoiGraduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea (the Republic of).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThyroid cancer is the most common cancer among Korean women. Studies suggest that the incidence of thyroid cancer might be associated with overdiagnosis resulting from thyroid cancer screening. The objective of this study was to identify the determinants of participation in thyroid cancer screening in Korean women.

methodsData were obtained from the 2016 Korean Study of Women's Health-Related Issues, a nationwide cross-sectional survey of women according to the reproductive life cycle. A total of 8697 cancer-free women of ages between 20 and 79 years were included for analysis. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was applied to analyse factors associated with adherence to thyroid cancer screening based on Andersen's health behavioural model.

resultsOver the last 2 years, the rate of thyroid cancer screening was 39.2%. In multivariable models, older age, higher household income, high school education level and higher perceived risk of cancer were positively associated with thyroid cancer screening participation. Moreover, women who underwent cervical cancer screening (adjusted OR [aOR] 3.67; 95% CI 2.90 to 4.64) and breast cancer screening (aOR 10.91; 95% CI 8.41 to 14.14) had higher odds of attending thyroid cancer screening than women who did not attend cancer screening.

conclusionsThese findings highlight the need to increase awareness of different recommendations on screening for various cancers to improve cost-effectiveness and to prevent unnecessary treatments.

Indexed as

Women's HealthAdolescentAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansIncidenceMass ScreeningMedical OveruseMiddle AgedRepublic of KoreaRetrospective StudiesThyroid NeoplasmsYoung Adultcancer screenighealth behaviorthyroid cancer

Identifiers

PMID30948602
PMCPMC6500224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.