Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30948568›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Qualitative descriptive study to explore nurses' perceptions and experience on pain, agitation and delirium management in a community intensive care unit.

Jennifer L Y Tsang, Katie Ross, Franziska Miller, Ramez Maximous, Priscilla Yung, Carl Marshall, Mercedes Camargo, Dimitra Fleming, Madelyn Law

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer L Y TsangDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1809-0505
Katie RossMedicine, Niagara Health System-Saint Catharines Site, Saint Catharines, Ontario, Canada.
Franziska MillerMcMaster University Michael G DeGroote School of Medicine, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Ramez MaximousMedicine, Niagara Health System-Saint Catharines Site, Saint Catharines, Ontario, Canada.
Priscilla YungMcMaster University Michael G DeGroote School of Medicine, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Carl MarshallMcMaster University Michael G DeGroote School of Medicine, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Mercedes CamargoMedicine, Niagara Health System-Saint Catharines Site, Saint Catharines, Ontario, Canada.
Dimitra FlemingMedicine, Niagara Health System-Saint Catharines Site, Saint Catharines, Ontario, Canada.
Madelyn LawCommunity Health Sciences, Brock University, St. Catherines, Ontario, Canada.
Niagara Health System · CAMcMaster University · CABrock University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe purpose of this study was to explore the experiences, beliefs and perceptions of intensive care unit (ICU) nurses on the management of pain, agitation and delirium (PAD) in critically ill patients.

designA qualitative descriptive study.

settingThis study took place in a community hospital ICU located in a medium size Canadian city.

participantsPurposeful sampling was conducted. Participants included full-time nurses working in the ICU. Forty-six ICU nurses participated.

methodsA total of five focus group sessions were held to collect data. There were one to three separate groups in each focus group session, with no more than seven participants in each group. There were 10 separate groups in total. A semistructured question guide was used. Thematic analysis method was adopted to analyse the data, and to search for emergent themes and patterns.

resultsThree main themes emerged: (1) the professional perspectives on patient wakefulness state, (2) the professional perspectives on PAD management of critically ill patients and (3) the factors impacting PAD management. Nurses have different opinions on the optimal level of patient sedation and felt that many factors, including environmental, healthcare teams, patients and family members, can influence PAD management. This potentially leads to inconsistent PAD management in critically ill patients. The nurses also believed that PAD management requires a multidisciplinary approach including healthcare teams and patients' families.

conclusionsMany external and internal factors contribute to the complexity of PAD management including the attitudes of nursing staff towards PAD. The themes emerged from this study suggested the need of a multifaceted and multidisciplinary quality improvement programme to optimise the management of PAD in the ICU.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelCritical CarePain ManagementAnalgesicsCanadaDeliriumFemaleFocus GroupsHospitals, CommunityHumansHypnotics and SedativesIntensive Care UnitsMaleNursing Staff, HospitalPatient Care TeamPsychomotor AgitationAnalgesicsHypnotics and Sedativesagitationcritical care nursedeliriumfocus grouppain management

Identifiers

PMID30948568
PMCPMC6500293
OpenAlexW2926483827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.