Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30948567›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Reduction in sympathetic tone in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea: is fixed CPAP more effective than APAP? A randomised, parallel trial protocol.

Erika Treptow, Jean Louis Pepin, Sebastien Bailly, Patrick Levy, Cecile Bosc, Marie Destors, Holger Woehrle, Renaud Tamisier

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03428516 (Decrease in Sympathetic Tone in OSA Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03428516 nacompletednot on this map

Decrease in Sympathetic Tone in OSA Patients: Is CPAP More Effective Than APAP ?

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, GrenobleRan2018 to 2022Enrolled57ConditionsSleep Apnea SyndromesArmsFixed CPAP, Auto-adjusting CPAP
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Treatment options in obstructive sleep apnea.Internal and emergency medicine · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Endotypes and phenotypes in obstructive sleep apnea.Current opinion in pulmonary medicine · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Erika TreptowHP2, Inserm 1042, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.
Jean Louis PepinHP2, Inserm 1042, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.
Sebastien BaillyHP2, Inserm 1042, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.
Patrick LevyHP2, Inserm 1042, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.
Cecile BoscCentre Santé et Sommeil, Grenoble, France.
Marie DestorsHP2, Inserm 1042, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.
Holger WoehrleLung Center Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Renaud TamisierHP2, Inserm 1042, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.
Université Grenoble Alpes · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble · FRInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionObstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is a prevalent disease associated with cardiovascular events. Hypertension is one of the major intermediary mechanisms leading to long-term cardiovascular adverse events. Intermittent hypoxia and hypercapnia associated with nocturnal respiratory events stimulate chemoreflexes, resulting in sympathetic overactivity and blood pressure (BP) elevation. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the primary treatment for OSA and induces a small but significant reduction in BP. The use of auto-adjusting positive airway pressure (APAP) has increased in the last years and studies showed different ranges of BP reduction when comparing both modalities. However, the pathophysiological mechanisms implicated are not fully elucidated. Variations in pressure through the night inherent to APAP may induce persistent respiratory efforts and sleep fragmentation that might impair sympathovagal balance during sleep and result in smaller decreases in BP. Therefore, this double-blind randomised controlled trial aims to compare muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) assessed by microneurography (reference method for measuring sympathetic activity) after 1 month of APAP versus fixed CPAP in treatment-naive OSA patients. This present manuscript describes the design of our study, no results are presented herein. and is registered under the below reference number. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Adult subjects with newly diagnosed OSA (Apnoea-Hypopnoea Index >20/hour) will be randomised for treatment with APAP or fixed CPAP. Measurements of sympathetic activity by MSNA, heart rate variability and catecholamines will be obtained at baseline and after 30 days. The primary composite outcome will be the change in sympathetic tone measured by MSNA in bursts/min and bursts/100 heartbeats. Sample size calculation was performed with bilateral assumption. We will use the Student's t-test to compare changes in sympathetic tone between groups. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol was approved by The French Regional Ethics Committee. The study started in March 2018 with primary completion expected to March 2019. Dissemination plans of the results include presentations at conferences and publication in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03428516; Pre-results.

Indexed as

Continuous Positive Airway PressureSleep Apnea, ObstructiveSympathetic Nervous SystemAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBlood Flow VelocityBlood PressureBlood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryCatecholaminesDouble-Blind MethodHeart RateHumansMiddle AgedMuscle, SkeletalCatecholaminescontinuous positive airway pressurehypertensionobstructive sleep apneasleep medicinesympathetic activity

Identifiers

PMID30948567
PMCPMC6500296
OpenAlexW2929849208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.