Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30948561›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Perceived quality of nursing care and patient education: a cross-sectional study of hospitalised surgical patients in Finland.

Weronica Gröndahl, Hanna Muurinen, Jouko Katajisto, Riitta Suhonen, Helena Leino-Kilpi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Knowledge of Diabetic Foot Among Nurses at a Tertiary Hospital in Saudi Arabia.Medical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina) · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Weronica GröndahlDigestive and Urology Clinic, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Hanna MuurinenDepartment of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Jouko KatajistoDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Riitta SuhonenDepartment of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Helena Leino-KilpiDepartment of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Turku University Hospital · FIUniversity of Turku · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aims to analyse the relationship between patient education and the quality of surgical nursing care as perceived by patients. The background of the study lies in the importance of a patient-centred approach for both patient education and quality evaluation.

designThis was a cross-sectional descriptive correlational study with surgical patients.

settingData were collected in 2013 in one hospital district in Finland.

participants480 hospitalised surgical patients.

methodsThe data were collected using two structured instruments: one measuring the perceived quality of nursing care experienced by patients (Good Nursing Care Scale) and one measuring the received knowledge of hospital patients (RKhp). Data were analysed statistically using descriptive and inferential statistics to describe the sample and study variables. Pearson's correlation coefficients were used to analyse the association between the scales.

resultsSurgical hospital patients evaluated the level of the quality of nursing care as high; this was especially true with reference to the environment and staff characteristics, but not to collaboration with family members. Most (85%) of the patients had received sufficient knowledge preoperatively and they were familiar with the proceeding of their care and treatment after discharge; in particular, they had received bio-physiological knowledge, consisting of knowledge of the disease, symptoms and the physiological elements of care. The positive correlation between the perceived quality of surgical nursing care and received knowledge was strong, suggesting a positive relationship between patient education and improvement of the quality of nursing care.

conclusionsBased on the results, the quality of nursing care and patient education are interconnected. Thus, by improving patient education, the quality of nursing care can also be improved. It is particularly important to improve collaboration with family members and patients' own management strategies as well as the multidimensionality of educational knowledge.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeNursing CarePatient Education as TopicQuality of Health CareSurgical Procedures, OperativeAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFinlandHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedNurse-Patient RelationsPatient Satisfactionpatient educationquality of caresurgical nursing care

Identifiers

PMID30948561
PMCPMC6500100
OpenAlexW2929050048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.