ArticleBrazilian journal of physical therapy
The London Chest Activity of Daily Living scale cut-off point to discriminate functional status in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Article in Brazilian journal of physical therapy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Development Technologies for the Monitoring of Six-Minute Walk Test: A Systematic Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Pooled it
- Systematic Review of Physical Activity, Sedentary Behaviour and Sleep Among Adults Living with Chronic Respiratory Disease in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2022Pooled it
- Optimising participation in a pulmonary rehabilitation programme for people living with chronic respiratory diseases in rural India: a feasibility study.Journal of global health · 2025Article
- Effects of Physical Exercise on Walking Distance and Functional Limitations in Patients with Chronic Dyspnea.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Feasibility of a Home-Based Cognitive-Physical Exercise Program in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Protocol for a Feasibility and Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2023Article
- Effectiveness and Safety of Multicomponent Physical Training in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial.Health services insights · 2023Article
- Quantifying the Effect of Monitor Wear Time and Monitor Type on the Estimate of Sedentary Time in People with COPD: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Clinical efficacy of glucocorticoid and terbutaline in the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.American journal of translational research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo determine the cut-off point for the London Chest Activity of Daily Living scale in order to better discriminate functional status. Secondarily, to determine which of the scores (total or %total) is better associated with clinical outcomes of a pulmonary rehabilitation program.
methodsSixty-one patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease performed the following tests: spirometry; Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment Test; Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire; modified Medical Research Council, the body-mass index, airflow obstruction, dyspnea, and exercise capacity index; six-minute walk test; physical activity in daily life assessment and London Chest Activity of Daily Living scale. Thirty-eight patients were evaluated pre- and post-pulmonary rehabilitation . The cut-off point was determined using the receiver operating characteristic curve with six-minute walk test (cut-off point: 82%pred), modified Medical Research Council (cut-off point: 2), level of physical (in)activity (cut-off point: 80min per day in physical activity ≥3 metabolic equivalent of task) and presence/absence of severe physical inactivity (cut-off point: 4580 steps per day) as anchors.
resultsA cut-off point found for all anchors was 28%: modified Medical Research Council [sensitivity=83%; specificity=72%; area under the curve=0.80]; level of physical (in)activity [sensitivity=65%; specificity=59%; area under the curve=0.67] and classification of severe physical inactivity [sensitivity=70%; specificity=62%; area under the curve=0.70]. The patients who scored ≤28% in %total score of London Chest Activity of Daily Living had lower modified Medical Research Council , Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment Test, Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire, body-mass index, airflow obstruction, dyspnea and exercise capacity index and sitting time than who scored >28%, and higher forced expiratory volume in the first second, time in physical activity ≥3 metabolic equivalent of task, steps per day and six-minute walk distance. The %total score of London Chest Activity of Daily Living correlated better with clinical outcomes than the total score.
conclusionsThe cut-off point of 28% is sensitive and specific to distinguish the functional status in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The %total score of the London Chest Activity of Daily Living reflects better outcomes of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease when compared to total score.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.