Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30947741›Full record

ArticleClinical epigenetics2019

Integrative analysis of DNA methylation in discordant twins unveils distinct architectures of systemic sclerosis subsets.

Paula S Ramos, Kip D Zimmerman, Sandra Haddad, Carl D Langefeld, Thomas A Medsger, Carol A Feghali-Bostwick

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical epigenetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. UnravelingFrontiers in oncology · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Epigenetic Modifications in the Pathogenesis of Systemic Sclerosis.International journal of general medicine · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Paula S RamosDivision of Rheumatology and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9433-6634
Kip D ZimmermanDepartment of Biostatistics and Data Science, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Sandra HaddadBay Path University, Longmeadow, MA, USA.
Carl D LangefeldDepartment of Biostatistics and Data Science, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Thomas A MedsgerDivision of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Carol A Feghali-BostwickDivision of Rheumatology and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA. feghalib@musc.edu.
Medical University of South Carolina · USWake Forest University · USBay Path University · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Scleroderma Twin Study and analysis of Estrogen in patients with dcSScK24AR060297 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI FEGHALI-BOSTWICK, CAROL A. · 2013 to 2025
$1.4M
The role of natural selection in SLE risk among African-AmericansK01AR067280 · NIAMS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI RAMOS, PAULA SOFIA · 2015 to 2018
$516k
NIAMS NIH HHS K01 AR067280NIAMS NIH HHS K24 AR060297
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSystemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare autoimmune fibrosing disease with an incompletely understood genetic and non-genetic etiology. Defining its etiology is important to allow the development of effective predictive, preventative, and therapeutic strategies. We conducted this epigenomic study to investigate the contributions of DNA methylation to the etiology of SSc while minimizing confounding due to genetic heterogeneity.

methodsGenomic methylation in whole blood from 27 twin pairs discordant for SSc was assayed over 450 K CpG sites. In silico integration with reported differentially methylated cytosines, differentially expressed genes, and regulatory annotation was conducted to validate and interpret the results.

resultsA total of 153 unique cytosines in limited cutaneous SSc (lcSSc) and 266 distinct sites in diffuse cutaneous SSc (dcSSc) showed suggestive differential methylation levels in affected twins. Integration with available data revealed 76 CpGs that were also differentially methylated in blood cells from lupus patients, suggesting their role as potential epigenetic blood biomarkers of autoimmunity. It also revealed 27 genes with concomitant differential expression in blood from SSc patients, including IFI44L and RSAD2. Regulatory annotation revealed that dcSSc-associated CpGs (but not lcSSc) are enriched at Encyclopedia of DNA Elements-, Roadmap-, and BLUEPRINT-derived regulatory regions, supporting their potential role in disease presentation. Notably, the predominant enrichment of regulatory regions in monocytes and macrophages is consistent with the role of these cells in fibrosis, suggesting that the observed cellular dysregulation might be, at least partly, due to altered epigenetic mechanisms of these cells in dcSSc.

conclusionsThese data implicate epigenetic changes in the pathogenesis of SSc and suggest functional mechanisms in SSc etiology.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationCpG IslandsDiseases in TwinsEpigenesis, GeneticFemaleGene Regulatory NetworksGenetic MarkersHumansMalePromoter Regions, GeneticScleroderma, SystemicTwins, MonozygoticGenetic MarkersBloodDNA methylationGenomeSystemic sclerosisTwins

Identifiers

PMID30947741
PMCPMC6449959
OpenAlexW2942788194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.