Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30947635›Full record

ArticlePsychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)2019

Risks to Privacy With Use of Social Media: Understanding the Views of Social Media Users With Serious Mental Illness.

John A Naslund, Kelly A Aschbrenner

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

John A NaslundDepartment of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston (Naslund); Department of Psychiatry, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire (Aschbrenner).
Kelly A AschbrennerDepartment of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston (Naslund); Department of Psychiatry, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire (Aschbrenner).
Dartmouth College · US

Funding

ESSENCE (Enabling translation of Science to Service to ENhance Depression CarE) Scale-UpU19MH113211 · NIMH · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI PATEL, VIKRAM H · 2017 to 2023
$3.7M
Peer Support and Mobile Technology Targeting Cardiometabolic Risk Reduction in Young Adults with SMIR01MH110965 · NIMH · DARTMOUTH-HITCHCOCK CLINIC · PI ASCHBRENNER, KELLY A · 2016 to 2019
$1.9M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH110965NIMH NIH HHS U19 MH113211
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSocial media may afford new opportunities to enhance mental health services; however, privacy risks have received less attention. This study explored privacy risks of using social media for reasons related to mental health from the perspectives of social media users with serious mental illness.

methodsTwitter users who self-identified in their profile as having a serious mental illness participated in an online survey inquiring whether they were ever concerned about risks to their privacy when using social media for anything related to their mental illness. User characteristics were compared between those who were concerned about risks and those who were not. Participants' responses to an open-ended question about privacy risks were analyzed thematically.

resultsAmong 90 respondents who self-identified as having schizophrenia spectrum disorders (40%), bipolar disorder (37%), or major depressive disorder (23%), more than one-third (36%) expressed concerns about privacy risks with using social media. Risks were more frequently reported among respondents with a college degree, compared with those without a college degree, and among respondents who were currently working or in school, compared with those who were not currently working. Thematic analysis of participants' responses to the open-ended question yielded four categories of risk: threats to employment, fear of stigma and being judged, impact on personal relationships, and facing hostility or being hurt.

conclusionsThese findings offer preliminary insights about the types of privacy risks that individuals with serious mental illness are concerned about when using social media for their mental health. The findings can inform the safety of future social media interventions.

Indexed as

Bipolar DisorderMajor Depressive DisorderMental Health ServicesPrivacySchizophreniaSocial MediaAdultFemaleHumansMaleQualitative ResearchRiskDigital technologyMental healthPrivacyRiskSerious mental illnessSocial media

Identifiers

PMID30947635
PMCPMC6602849
OpenAlexW2935264049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.