Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30947398›Full record

ReviewPlant biotechnology journal2019

MicroRNAs and new biotechnological tools for its modulation and improving stress tolerance in plants.

Marcos Fernando Basso, Paulo Cavalcanti Gomes Ferreira, Adilson Kenji Kobayashi, Frank G Harmon, Alexandre Lima Nepomuceno, Hugo Bruno Correa Molinari, Maria Fatima Grossi-de-Sa

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plant biotechnology journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
23.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 160 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Horticulture research · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Diversity of Expression Patterns ofCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Pan-Genome Analysis ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Marcos Fernando BassoEmbrapa Genetic Resources and Biotechnology, Brasília, DF, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8192-8959
Paulo Cavalcanti Gomes FerreiraFederal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Adilson Kenji KobayashiEmbrapa Agroenergy, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Frank G HarmonPlant Gene Expression Center, USDA-ARS, Albany, CA, USA.
Alexandre Lima NepomucenoEmbrapa Soybean, Londrina, PR, Brazil.
Hugo Bruno Correa MolinariEmbrapa Agroenergy, Brasília, DF, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9951-8229
Maria Fatima Grossi-de-SaEmbrapa Genetic Resources and Biotechnology, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation · BRPlant Gene Expression Center · USUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) modulate the abundance and spatial-temporal accumulation of target mRNAs and indirectly regulate several plant processes. Transcriptional regulation of the genes encoding miRNAs (MIR genes) can be activated by numerous transcription factors, which themselves are regulated by other miRNAs. Fine-tuning of MIR genes or miRNAs is a powerful biotechnological strategy to improve tolerance to abiotic or biotic stresses in crops of economic importance. Current approaches for miRNA fine-tuning are based on the down- or up-regulation of MIR gene transcription and the use of genetic engineering tools to manipulate the final concentration of these miRNAs in the cytoplasm. Transgenesis, cisgenesis, intragenesis, artificial MIR genes, endogenous and artificial target mimicry, MIR genes editing using Meganucleases, ZNF proteins, TALENs and CRISPR/Cas9 or CRISPR/Cpf1, CRISPR/dCas9 or dCpf1, CRISPR13a, topical delivery of miRNAs and epigenetic memory have been successfully explored to MIR gene or miRNA modulation and improve agronomic traits in several model or crop plants. However, advantages and drawbacks of each of these new biotechnological tools (NBTs) are still not well understood. In this review, we provide a brief overview of the biogenesis and role of miRNAs in response to abiotic or biotic stresses, we present critically the main NBTs used for the manipulation of MIR genes and miRNAs, we show current efforts and findings with the MIR genes and miRNAs modulation in plants, and we summarize the advantages and drawbacks of these NBTs and provide some alternatives to overcome. Finally, challenges and future perspectives to miRNA modulating in important crops are also discussed.

Indexed as

BiotechnologyStress, PhysiologicalCrops, AgriculturalGene Expression Regulation, PlantMicroRNAsPlant BreedingMicroRNAsgenetic engineering toolsMIR genesmiRNA modulationplant molecular biologyposttranscriptional gene silencingsmall interfering RNA

Identifiers

PMID30947398
PMCPMC6662102
OpenAlexW2933811114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.