Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30947314›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2019

The quality of skilled birth attendants in Nepal: High aspirations and ground realities.

Ruma Rajbhandari, Shovana Rai, Sejal Hathi, Rita Thapa, Indra Rai, Anil Shrestha

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06577922 (Evaluation of Maternal & Newborn Health Simulation Lab Centers of Excellence in Seven Referral Hospitals of Nepal), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06577922 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of Maternal & Newborn Health Simulation Lab Centers of Excellence in Seven Referral Hospitals of Nepal

TypeinterventionalSponsorOne Heart WorldwideRan2024 to 2026Enrolled1,464ConditionsPost Partum Hemorrhage, Asphyxia, Fetal, Maternal-Fetal RelationsArmsEstablishment of a simulation lab and provision of simulation based trainings
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ruma RajbhandariDivision of Global Health Equity, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8281-550X
Shovana RaiNick Simons Institute, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Sejal HathiStanford Medical School, Palo Alto, California, United States of America.
Rita ThapaNick Simons Institute, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Indra RaiNick Simons Institute, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Anil ShresthaNick Simons Institute, Kathmandu, Nepal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile Nepal's maternal mortality ratio (MMR) has improved overall, the proportion of maternal deaths occurring in health facilities and attended to by skilled birth attendants (SBAs), has nearly doubled over 12 years. Although there are numerous socioeconomic, environmental and other factors at play, one possible explanation for this discrepancy between utilization of skilled maternal care services and birth outcomes lies in the quality of care being provided by SBAs. The objective of this study is to determine how competent SBAs are after training, across multiple settings and facility types in Nepal.

methodsWe used a quantitative cross-sectional analysis to evaluate a sample of 511 SBAs, all female, from 276 sub-health posts (SHP), health posts (HP), primary healthcare centers (PHC), and district and regional hospitals in the mountain, hill, and terai districts of Nepal. Any SBA actively employed by one of these health facilities was included. SBAs who had received less than three months of training were excluded. Outcomes were measured using SBAs' scores on a standardized knowledge assessment, clinical skills assessment, and monthly delivery volume, particularly as it compared with the WHO's recommendation for minimum monthly volume to maintain competence.

resultsSBAs on average exhibit a deficiency of both knowledge and clinical skills, failing to meet even the 80-percent standard that is required to pass training (knowledge: 75%, standard deviation 12%; clinical skills: 48%, standard deviation 15%). Moreover, SBAs are conducting very few deliveries, with only 7 percent (38/511) meeting the minimal volume recommended to maintain competence by the WHO, and a substantial fraction (70/511, 14%) performing an average of no monthly deliveries at all.

conclusionsTaken together, our findings suggest that while countries like Nepal have made important investments in SBA programs, these healthcare workers are failing to receive either effective training or sufficient practice to stay clinically competent and knowledgeable in the field. This could in part explain why institutional deliveries have generally failed to deliver better outcomes for pregnant women and their babies.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelParturitionQuality of Health CareAdultClinical CompetenceCross-Sectional StudiesDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHealth FacilitiesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansInfant, NewbornMaternal Health ServicesMiddle AgedMidwiferyNepal

Identifiers

PMID30947314
PMCPMC6448824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.