Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30947305›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Land use, REDD+ and the status of wildlife populations in Yaeda Valley, northern Tanzania.

Christian Kiffner, Zoe Arndt, Trent Foky, Megan Gaeth, Alex Gannett, Madeline Jackson, Georgie Lellman, Sophia Love, Ana Maroldi, Shane McLaughlin and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Christian KiffnerCenter For Wildlife Management Studies, The School For Field Studies, Karatu, Tanzania.ORCID 0000-0002-7475-9023
Zoe ArndtZoology Department, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, United States of America.
Trent FokyWhitman College, Walla Walla, WA, United States of America.
Megan GaethBiology Department, Guilford College, Greensboro, North Carolina, United States of America.
Alex GannettEnvironmental Studies, Gonzaga University, Spokane, WA, United States of America.
Madeline JacksonEcology, Evolution and Behavior, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, United States of America.
Georgie LellmanKenyon College, Gambier, OH, United States of America.
Sophia LoveWhitman College, Walla Walla, WA, United States of America.
Ana MaroldiDepartment of Veterinary and Animal Science, University of Massachusetts-Amherst, Amherst, MA, United States of America.
Shane McLaughlinEnvironmental Science Program, Trinity College, Hartford, CT, United States of America.
Bobbi SkenandoreNelson Institute for Environmental Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.
Sarah von EulerBiology Department, Davidson College, Davidson, NC, United States of America.
Zachary ZambranoDepartment of Animal Sciences and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, United States of America.
Bernard KissuiCenter For Wildlife Management Studies, The School For Field Studies, Karatu, Tanzania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

REDD+ projects primarily focus on reducing carbon emissions from deforestation and forest degradation in developing countries. These projects are regularly evaluated against their core objective of conserving carbon stocks, but their contribution to biodiversity conservation has rarely been assessed. To assess the conservation value of the area and the relative performance of a REDD+ land use plan in Yaeda Valley, a semi-arid savannah ecosystem in northern Tanzania, we implemented an annual wildlife monitoring scheme. Based on direct sightings and indirect signs of wildlife, obtained from stratified walking transects conducted annually from 2015-2018, we estimated annual trends of mammal species richness and wildlife densities in three REDD+ and three non-REDD+ land-use strata. Our surveys document a near complete mammal community in the area. Species accumulation curves, and subsequent statistical comparisons, indicated highest mammal species richness in the woodland habitats (both REDD+ and non REDD+ strata) as compared to more human and livestock impacted areas, and suggested constant species richness from 2015-2018. To estimate stratum- and year-specific livestock and wildlife densities (cattle, donkey, goat and sheep combined, Thomson's gazelle, Kirk's dik-dik) and wildlife sign densities (aardvark, bushbuck, bushpig, Kirk's dik dik, eland, elephant, Maasai giraffe, greater kudu, hyena, impala, lesser kudu, warthog, wildebeest, Plains zebra), we fitted species-specific detection functions in a distance sampling framework. Species-specific densities varied between 2015 and 2018 and showed substantial increases and occasional declines in other species-stratum combinations. However, population growth rates were not systematically associated with specific land-use strata. Although our results do not explicitly provide evidence that REDD+ land-use plans directly co-benefit wildlife conservation, they show that REDD+ areas have the potential to maintain intact wildlife assemblages. To ensure effective long-term conservation outcomes, we advocate for a more formal integration of wildlife conservation goals in the REDD+ scheme.

Indexed as

Animals, WildAnimalsBiodiversityCarbonConservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemEnvironmental MonitoringForestsHumansLivestockMammalsNatural ResourcesPopulation DynamicsSpecies SpecificityTanzaniaCarbon

Identifiers

PMID30947305
PMCPMC6448838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.