Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30947259›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2019

Association between histamine-2 receptor antagonists and adverse outcomes in neonates: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Victor S Santos, Marina S Freire, Ruth N S Santana, Paulo R S Martins-Filho, Luis E Cuevas, Ricardo Q Gurgel

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Victor S SantosCentre for Epidemiology and Public Health. Federal University of Alagoas, Arapiraca, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0194-7397
Marina S FreireDepartment of Medicine. Federal University of Sergipe, Aracaju, Brazil.
Ruth N S SantanaDepartment of Medicine. Federal University of Sergipe, Aracaju, Brazil.
Paulo R S Martins-FilhoPostgraduate Programme in Health Science. Federal University of Sergipe, Aracaju, Brazil.
Luis E CuevasLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Ricardo Q GurgelDepartment of Medicine. Federal University of Sergipe, Aracaju, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9651-3713
Universidade Federal de Sergipe · BRLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine · GBUniversidade Federal de Alagoas · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2RA) in neonates is still debated because of possible risk of infection, necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) and increased mortality.

aimTo review whether the use of H2RA in neonates admitted to neonatal intensive care units (NICU) is associated with infection, NEC or mortality. MATERIALS AND

methodWe performed a systematic search in PubMed, Web of Science and SCOPUS databases using the terms "histamine-2 receptor antagonists", "infection", "necrotizing enterocolitis", "mortality", "neonates" and related terms to identify studies published up to April 30, 2017. We included studies conducted in hospitalized neonates and exposed to H2RA. The primary outcomes were infection, NEC and mortality. We included reports of infections with clinical signs and positive culture, and NEC according to Bell stages (stage ≥II) based on standardised clinical and radiologic criteria. Among 1,144 studies identified, 10 fulfilled the selection criteria. Information extracted included study design, sample size and number of participants, along with the outcomes of interest. We conducted a meta-analysis of adjusted data and pooled estimates of infection, NEC and mortality are reported as odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI).

resultsTen studies were analysed. There were substantial associations between H2RA and infection (pooled OR: 2.09; 95%CI: 1.35-3.24; P = 0.001) and NEC (pooled OR: 2.81, 95%CI: 1.19-6.64; P = 0.02) but not with the mortality risk (pooled OR: 1.76; 95%CI: 0.50-6.16; P: 0.38).

conclusionCurrent evidence suggests that H2RA is associated with an increased risk of infection and NEC, but not with mortality in neonates admitted to NICU. The use of H2RA in neonates must be stringently considered when necessary.

Indexed as

Case-Control StudiesHistamine H2 AntagonistsHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, Newborn, DiseasesPublication BiasRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeHistamine H2 Antagonists

Identifiers

PMID30947259
PMCPMC6448909
OpenAlexW2925644922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.