Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30947247›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Long-term Chinese calligraphic handwriting reshapes the posterior cingulate cortex: A VBM study.

Wen Chen, Chuansheng Chen, Pin Yang, Suyu Bi, Jin Liu, Mingrui Xia, Qixiang Lin, Na Ma, Na Li, Yong He and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Interpol questioned documents review 2019-2022.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Wen ChenAdvanced Innovation Center for Future Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7563-4495
Chuansheng ChenDepartment of Psychological Science, University of California, Irvine, California, United States of America.
Pin YangConservation Department, The National Palace Museum, Beijing, China.
Suyu BiSchool of International Journalism and Communication, Beijing Foreign Studies University, Beijing, China.
Jin LiuState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Mingrui XiaState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Qixiang LinState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Na MaState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Na LiState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Yong HeState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Jiacai ZhangCollege of Information Science and Technology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Yiwen WangSchool of International Journalism and Communication, Beijing Foreign Studies University, Beijing, China.
Wenjing WangState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As a special kind of handwriting with a brush, Chinese calligraphic handwriting (CCH) requires a large amount of practice with high levels of concentration and emotion regulation. Previous studies have showed that long-term CCH training has positive effects physically (induced by handwriting activities) and psychologically (induced by the state of relaxation and concentration), the latter of which is similar to the effects of meditation. The aim of this study was to investigate the long-term CCH training effect on anxiety and attention, as well as brain structure. Participants were 32 individuals who had at least five years of CCH experience and 44 controls. Results showed that CCH training benefited individuals' selective and divided attention but did not decrease their anxiety level. Moreover, the VBM analysis showed that long-term CCH training was mainly associated with smaller grey matter volumes (GMV) in the right precuneus/posterior cingulate cortex (PCC). No brain areas showed larger GMV in the CCH group than the control group. Using two sets of regions of interest (ROIs), one related to meditation and the other to handwriting, ROI analysis showed significant differences between the CCH and the control group only at the meditation-related ROIs, not at the handwriting-related ROIs. Finally, for the whole sample, the GMV of both the whole brain and the PCC were negatively correlated with selective attention and divided attention. The present study was cross-sectional and had a relatively small sample size, but its results suggested that CCH training might benefit attention and influence particular brain structure through mental processes such as meditation.

Indexed as

Gyrus CinguliHandwritingMagnetic Resonance ImagingParietal LobeAdolescentAdultAttentionBrain MappingChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID30947247
PMCPMC6448813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.