ArticleJournal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials2019
Biomechanical test protocols to detect minor injury effects in intervertebral discs.
Article in Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sequential delivery of sinigrin and dabigatran by anMaterials today. Bio · 2026Article
- Multiscale mechanical-adapted hydrogels for the repair of intervertebral disc degeneration.Bioactive materials · 2025Article
- Can axial loading restore in vivo disc geometry, opening pressure, and T2 relaxation time?JOR spine · 2024Article
- TGF-β1-supplemented decellularized annulus fibrosus matrix hydrogels promote annulus fibrosus repair.Bioactive materials · 2023Article
- Ex vivo biomechanical evaluation of Acute lumbar endplate injury and comparison to annulus fibrosus injury in a rat model.Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · 2022Article
- High fat diet causes inferior vertebral structure and function without disc degeneration in RAGE-KO mice.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2022Article
- Does the neutral zone quantification method matter? Efficacy of evaluating neutral zone during destabilization and restabilization in human spine implant testing.Journal of biomechanics · 2021Article
- Article
- Measuring the neutral zone of spinal motion segments: Comparison of multiple analysis methods to quantify spinal instability.JOR spine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Intervertebral discs (IVDs) maintain flexibility of the spine and bear mechanical load. Annulus fibrosus (AF) defects are associated with IVD degeneration and herniation which disrupt biomechanical function and can cause pain. AF puncture injuries can induce IVD degeneration but are needed to inject therapies. Identifying small AF defects with biomechanical testing can be difficult because IVDs have a complex, composite structure and nonlinear biomechanical properties that are dependent on AF fiber tension. It remains unclear how choice of biomechanical testing protocols affect the sensitivity of biomechanical properties to AF injuries. This study determined whether axial preload or magnitude of cyclic axial or torsional testing affected the ability to detect minor AF defects in rat caudal motion segments using ex vivo biomechanical testing. Intact and injured motion segments were subjected to a repeated measures study design with multiple biomechanical testing protocols that varied axial tension-compression force amplitude (±1.6 N, ±8.0 N, ±16.0 N), axial preload (-1.6 N, -8.0 N, -16.0 N, corresponding to -0.1 MPa, -0.5 MPa, and -1.0 MPa, respectively), and torsional rotation angle (±10°, ±15°, and ±20°). Biomechanical properties obtained from the lowest force testing conditions for axial tension-compression (±1.6 N), axial preload (-1.6 N), and angular rotation (±10°) exhibited the largest differences in biomechanical properties between intact and injured conditions. Biomechanical properties determined under low axial force or torsion amplitudes involve less AF fiber tension and were most sensitive to injury. Low force testing protocols are recommended for detecting minor structural AF defects and may enable more precise assessments of IVD injuries, healing or repair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.