ArticleTransfusion2019
Implementation of a script for predonation interviews: impact on human immunodeficiency virus risk in South African blood donors.
Article in Transfusion, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic review of prevalence and risk factors of transfusion transmissible infections among blood donors, and blood safety improvements in Southern Africa.Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England) · 2023Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe way in which the donor history questionnaire is conducted plays a crucial role in the self-disclosure of behavioral risk factors for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection by prospective donors. The South African National Blood Service changed its policy on the process of donor assessment in May 2015 by implementing a compulsory interviewer script used to assess donor eligibility. STUDY DESIGN AND
methodsA pre- and postevaluation study to determine the impact of scripted interviews on high-risk deferrals and recently acquired HIV infections. We used historical data to compare 18 months before and after the implementation of the script.
resultsWe recorded a total of 3,169,656 donor presentations during the two 18-months periods, of which 52.2% (1,655,352) were made during the scripted period. A multivariable logistic regression analysis adjusting for donor and demographic characteristics found the odds of high-risk deferral to be slightly greater (odds ratio [OR], 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.07) during the scripted period. A separate multivariate logistic regression model, also adjusting for donor and demographic characteristics, showed that the odds of recently acquired HIV infection were significantly lower (OR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.79-0.97) during the scripted period.
conclusionThis study showed that implementation of a scripted interview was associated with increased HIV risk deferral and decreased recent HIV infection. This study indicates potential improvement in blood safety with the implementation of a scripted donor interview and has relevance to blood safety in other sub-Saharan African countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.