Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30946373›Full record

Observational studyMedicine2019

Utility of point-of-care Gram stain by physicians for urinary tract infection in children ≤36 months.

Toshifumi Yodoshi, Masato Matsushima, Tomohiro Taniguchi, Saori Kinjo

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Case reports in nephrology and dialysis
    Article
  14. Unmet Need of Antenatal Screening for Asymptomatic Bacteriuria: A Risk Factor for Adverse Outcomes of Pregnancy.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine
    Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Toshifumi YodoshiDepartment of Pediatrics, Okinawa Chubu Hospital, Okinawa.
Masato MatsushimaDivision of Clinical Epidemiology, Research Center for Medical Sciences, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Tomohiro TaniguchiDivision of General Internal Medicine & Infectious Diseases, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Saori KinjoDepartment of Pediatrics, Okinawa Chubu Hospital, Okinawa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urinary tract infection (UTI) in children requires early diagnosis and treatment to prevent repeated UTI and renal scarring. This study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of the point-of-care Gram stain by physicians for suspected UTI in children at Okinawa Chubu Hospital as a rapid diagnostic test.A single-center, retrospective study was undertaken between January 2011 and December 2015. Patients aged 36 months or younger who were reviewed had suspected UTI in the emergency room or outpatient clinic. Urine culture, urinalysis, and point-of-care Gram stain were performed on a single specimen. Patients with structural or functional urological defects requiring routine catheterization were excluded. We compared the diagnostic performance among the rapid diagnostic tests (i.e., pyuria, point-of-care Gram stain, or both). Kappa statistics were used to evaluate the agreement between the results of point-of-care Gram stain and morphotypes of urine culture with the 95% CI (bias corrected bootstrap interval). We also analyzed which antibiotics were more susceptible to the bacteria of urine culture results, selected by the results of point-of-care Gram stain or empirical treatment based on the Japanese guidelines by McNemar test.Of 1594 patients reviewed in the study, 1546 were eligible according to our inclusion criteria. Using urine culture as the gold standard for UTI, the sensitivity and specificity of pyuria were 73.2% and 95.1%, whereas those of the point-of-care Gram stain were 81.4% and 98.2%, respectively. The concordance rate between the morphotypes of bacteria detected by point-of-care Gram stain and those of urine culture was 0.784 (kappa coefficient) (95% CI 0.736-0.831). Furthermore, the proportion of "susceptible" in the minimum inhibitory concentration of pathogen-targeted treatment based on the point-of-care Gram stain was higher than that of empirical therapy (exact McNemar significance probability: .0001).Our analysis suggests that the point-of-care Gram stain is a useful rapid diagnostic tool for suspected UTI in young children. Pathogen-targeted treatment based on the point-of-care Gram stain would lead to better antibiotic selection compared with empirical therapy.

Indexed as

Point-of-Care SystemsAnti-Bacterial AgentsChild, PreschoolFemaleGentian VioletHumansInfantMalePhenazinesPyuriaRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityUrinalysisUrinary Tract InfectionsAnti-Bacterial AgentsGentian VioletGram's stainPhenazines

Identifiers

PMID30946373
PMCPMC6456128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.