Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30946356›Full record

SynthesisMedicine2019

Qian lie an suppository (prostant) for chronic prostatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Cao Hui-Juan, Liang Shi-Bing, Liu Jian-Ping, Wang Bin, Li Hai-Song, Wang Ji-Sheng, Guan Si-Qi, Zhu Yu-Tian, Dai Heng-Heng, Zhou Chun-Yu

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. The Clinical Effect and Mechanism of Prostant on Urinary Retention and Anal Pain.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cao Hui-JuanCentre for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing.
Liang Shi-BingCentre for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing.
Liu Jian-PingCentre for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing.
Wang BinDong Zhi Men Hospital, the 1st Affiliated Hospital of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine.
Li Hai-SongDong Zhi Men Hospital, the 1st Affiliated Hospital of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine.
Wang Ji-ShengDong Zhi Men Hospital, the 1st Affiliated Hospital of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine.
Guan Si-QiDong Zhi Men Hospital, the 1st Affiliated Hospital of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine.
Zhu Yu-TianDong Zhi Men Hospital, the 1st Affiliated Hospital of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine.
Dai Heng-HengDong Zhi Men Hospital, the 1st Affiliated Hospital of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine.
Zhou Chun-YuOffice of Science and Technology Administration, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Beijing University of Chinese Medicine · CNShanxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic prostatitis (CP) is an inflammation of the prostate gland that seriously affects the quality of life of patients. The existing evidence of antibiotics and α-blockers for the treatment of CP is limited.

objectivesThis review evaluated the effectiveness and safety of Qian Lie An Suppository (Prostant) in treating CP.

methodsRandomized controlled trials comparing Prostant (alone or plus the control) with placebo, conventional drugs, or nonpharmaceutical therapies for CP were included in this article through searching from 6 databases. Data were analyzed using RevMan 5.3 software. Meta-analysis was performed when the clinical or statistical heterogeneity was found acceptable among trials. Estimate effects were present with risk ratio (RR) or mean difference and their 95% confidence interval (CI) for dichotomies or continuous variables. Quality of the evidence for each primary outcome was assessed using GRADE criteria.

resultsTotally 21 trials involving 3359 participants were included. There were 2 included trials had unclear risk of bias, and the remaining trials had high risk of bias. Meta-analyses showed the number of cured patients in the Prostant group was 2 times more than that of the placebo (RR 2.05, 95%CI 1.10 to 3.81) or antibiotics (RR 1.95, 95%CI 1.18 to 3.23) groups. Similar results were found when Prostant in combination with antibiotics or hyperthermia compared with the antibiotics (RR 1.78, 95% CI 1.10-2.89) or hyperthermia (RR 1.72, 95% CI 1.23-2.40) alone. However, there was no difference in the number of cured patients between Prostant and α-blockers or hyperthermia therapy. No severe adverse event was reported in all included trials. The main adverse events in Prostant group were reported (in 8 included trials) as diarrhea and anal discomfort.

conclusionsLow-quality evidence showed that the Prostant may have add-on effect for patients with CP on increasing the number of cured patients, relieving pain, and improving the quality of life. There is not sufficient evidence to determine the effectiveness and safety of Prostant for the treatment of CP compared with placebo, antibiotics, α-blockers or the hyperthermia therapy.

Indexed as

Administration, RectalAnti-Bacterial AgentsChronic DiseaseDrugs, Chinese HerbalDrug Therapy, CombinationHumansMaleProstatitisQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSuppositoriesAnti-Bacterial AgentsDrugs, Chinese HerbalprostantSuppositories

Identifiers

PMID30946356
PMCPMC6456157
OpenAlexW2926599429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.