Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30946334›Full record

ArticleMedicine2019

Prediction of ISUP grading of clear cell renal cell carcinoma using support vector machine model based on CT images.

Xiaoqing Sun, Lin Liu, Kai Xu, Wenhui Li, Ziqi Huo, Heng Liu, Tongxu Shen, Feng Pan, Yuqing Jiang, Mengchao Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaoqing SunDepartment of Radiology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University.
Lin LiuDepartment of Radiology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University.
Kai XuDepartment of Radiology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University.
Wenhui LiCollege of Computer Science and Technology, Jilin University.
Ziqi HuoDepartment of Radiology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University.
Heng LiuDepartment of Orthopaedics, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China.
Tongxu ShenDepartment of Radiology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University.
Feng PanDepartment of Radiology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University.
Yuqing JiangDepartment of Radiology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University.
Mengchao ZhangDepartment of Radiology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University.
Jilin University · CNUnion Hospital · CNUnion Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo explore whether radiomics combined with computed tomography (CT) images can be used to establish a model for differentiating high grade (International Society of Urological Pathology [ISUP] grade III-IV) from low-grade (ISUP I-II) clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC).

methodsFor this retrospective study, 3-phase contrast-enhanced CT images were collected from 227 patients with pathologically confirmed ISUP-grade ccRCC (155 cases in the low-grade group and 72 cases in the high-grade group). First, we delineated the largest dimension of the tumor in the corticomedullary and nephrographic CT images to obtain the region of interest. Second, variance selection, single variable selection, and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator were used to select features in the corticomedullary phase, nephrographic phase, and 2-phase union samples, respectively. Finally, a model was constructed using the optimal features, and the receiver operating characteristic curve and area under the curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the predictive performance of the features in the training and validation queues. A Z test was employed to compare the differences in AUC values.

resultsThe support vector machine (SVM) model constructed using the screening features for the 2-stage joint samples can effectively distinguish between high- and low-grade ccRCC, and obtained the highest prediction accuracy. Its AUC values in the training queue and the validation queue were 0.88 and 0.91, respectively. The results of the Z test showed that the differences between the 3 groups were not statistically significant.

conclusionThe SVM model constructed by CT-based radiomic features can effectively identify the ISUP grades of ccRCC.

Indexed as

Area Under CurveCarcinoma, Renal CellDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansKidney NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesROC CurveSupport Vector MachineTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID30946334
PMCPMC6456158
OpenAlexW2935065396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.