SynthesisMedicine2019
Comparative efficacy and safety of bridging strategies with direct mechanical thrombectomy in large vessel occlusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neuroprotective Effect and Possible Mechanisms of Ginsenoside-Rd for Cerebral Ischemia/Reperfusion Damage in Experimental Animal: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2022Pooled it
- Comparison of Prior Bridging Intravenous Thrombolysis With Direct Endovascular Thrombectomy for Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusion: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Pooled it
- Endovascular Thrombectomy With or Without Thrombolysis for Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.The Neurohospitalist · 2024Article
- Article
- Direct Mechanical Thrombectomy vs. Bridging Therapy in Stroke Patients in A "Stroke Belt" Region of Southern Europe.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- Silver Jubilee of Stroke Thrombolysis With Alteplase: Evolution of the Therapeutic Window.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Review
- MRI predictors of intracranial hemorrhage in acute ischemic stroke after endovascular thrombectomy therapy.American journal of translational research · 2020Article
- Bridging therapy is associated with improved cognitive function after large vessel occlusion stroke - an analysis of the German Stroke Registry.Neurological research and practice · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhether bridging strategies[intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) + mechanical thrombectomy (MT)] are superior to mechanical thrombectomy alone for large vessel occlusion(LVO) is still uncertain. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to investigate and evaluate comparative efficacy and safety of bridging strategies vs direct MT in patients with LVO.
methodsThe PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane library databases were searched to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bridging strategies with direct MT in LVO. Functional independence, mortality, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and successful recanalization were assessed. The risk ratio (RR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated.
resultsThe proportion of patients who received MT + IVT was significantly higher in functional independence and successful recanalization rate than MT alone patients. However, pooled results showed that the mortality of patients who received MT + IVT was significantly lower than that of MT alone patients. Moreover, no significant differences were observed in the incidence of sICH between the 2 groups.
conclusionThe findings of our meta-analysis confirmed that bridging strategies improved functional outcomes, successful recanalization rate and reduced mortality rates. Moreover, the incidence of sICH showed no differences between the bridging strategies and MT alone treatments. However, the conduct of high-quality randomized clinical trials that directly compare both strategies is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.