Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30946217›Full record

ReviewTransplantation2019

Single-cell Transcriptomics and Solid Organ Transplantation.

Andrew F Malone, Benjamin D Humphreys

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Transplantation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. T Cells With ActivatedFrontiers in immunology · 2022
    Article
  13. Cancer Risk and Mutational Patterns Following Organ Transplantation.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Banff Digital Pathology Working Group: Going digital in transplant pathology.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Andrew F MaloneDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, MO.
Benjamin D HumphreysDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, MO.

Funding

Adult Progenitors in Kidney TubulointerstitiumUH3DK107374 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI HUMPHREYS, BENJAMIN D. · 2017 to 2019
$948k
NIDDK NIH HHS UH3 DK107374
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) allows the measurement of transcriptomes from individual cells providing new insights into complex biological systems. scRNA-seq has enabled the identification of rare cell types, new cell states, and intercellular communication networks that may be masked by traditional bulk transcriptional profiling. Researchers are increasingly using scRNA-seq to comprehensively characterize complex organs in health and disease. The diversity of immune cell types, some present at low frequency, in a transplanted organ undergoing rejection makes scRNA-seq ideally suited to characterize transplant pathologies because it can quantify subtle transcriptional differences between rare cell types. In this review, we discuss single-cell sequencing methods and their application in transplantation to date, current challenges, and future directions. We believe that the remarkably rapid pace of technological development in this field makes it likely that single-cell technologies such as scRNA-seq will have an impact on clinical transplantation within a decade.

Indexed as

Organ TransplantationRNA-SeqSingle-Cell AnalysisTranscriptomeAnimalsGene Expression RegulationGene Regulatory NetworksHumansPredictive Value of TestsRisk FactorsSignal TransductionTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID30946217
PMCPMC6713581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.