Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30946143›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in HIV and AIDS2019

Ethical issues in HIV phylogenetics and molecular epidemiology.

Sanjay R Mehta, Cynthia Schairer, Susan Little

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in HIV and AIDS, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Tracking HIV Through Wastewater: Ethical Considerations in Public Health Surveillance.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Molecular HIV Surveillance: Beyond Cluster Detection and Response.AIDS research and human retroviruses · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sanjay R MehtaDepartments of Medicine and Pathology, University of California San Diego.
Cynthia SchairerDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego.
Susan LittleDepartment of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.

Funding

UC San Diego Clinical and Translational Research InstituteUL1TR001442 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI FIRESTEIN, GARY S, HOGARTH, MICHAEL · 2015 to 2024
$88.3M
VirologyP30AI036214 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI David Mitchell Smith · 1994 to 2026
$78.4M
Primary Infection Resource Consortium (PIRC)R24AI106039 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI LITTLE, SUSAN JANET · 2013 to 2021
$23.1M
Efficacy of ART to Interrupt HIV Transmission NetworksR01MH100974 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI LITTLE, SUSAN JANET · 2014 to 2018
$3.2M
Molecular Epidemiology of HIV-1 in the California-Mexico Border RegionK23AI093163 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI MEHTA, SANJAY R · 2011 to 2015
$643k
Characterizing Privacy Perceptions and Risks in HIV Molecular EpidemiologyR21AI108351 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI KALICHMAN, MICHAEL W, LITTLE, SUSAN JANET · 2014 to 2015
$426k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001442NIAID NIH HHS K23 AI093163NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI036214NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI108351NIAID NIH HHS R24 AI106039NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH100974
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewHIV phylogenetic and molecular epidemiology analyses are increasingly being performed with a goal of improving HIV prevention efforts. However, ethical, legal and social issues are associated with these analyses, and should be considered when performed. RECENT

findingsSeveral working groups have recently outlined the major issues surrounding the use of molecular epidemiology for HIV prevention. First, the benefits of HIV molecular epidemiology remain unclear, and further work is needed to quantitatively demonstrate the benefits that can be expected. Second, privacy loss is an important risk, with implications of disclosure varying by the regional legal and social climate. Inferential privacy risks will increase with technological improvements in sequencing and analysis. Third, data sharing, which enhances the utility of the data, may also increase the risk of inferential privacy loss. Mitigation strategies are available to address each of these issues. SUMMARY: HIV molecular epidemiology for research and public health pose significant ethical issues that continue to evolve with improving technology, increased sampling and a changing legal and social climate. Guidance surrounding these issues needs to be developed for researchers and public health officials in an iterative and region specific manner that accounts for the potential benefits and risks of this technology.

Indexed as

PhylogenyHIVHIV InfectionsHumansMolecular EpidemiologyPublic Health

Identifiers

PMID30946143
PMCPMC6450547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.