Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30946076›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgery2021

Outcome of 1000 Patients With Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST) Treated by Surgery in the Pre- and Post-imatinib Eras.

Michael J Cavnar, Kenneth Seier, Christina Curtin, Vinod P Balachandran, Daniel G Coit, Sam S Yoon, Aimee M Crago, Vivian E Strong, William D Tap, Mithat Gönen and 4 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Long-term outcomes of a phase II study of neoadjuvant imatinib in large gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2023
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Updated Asian consensus guidelines for the diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (2025).Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A pure endoscopic full-thickness resection of a large non-metastatic GI stromal tumor >5 cm of the stomach after neoadjuvant imatinib therapy.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. The impact of contour maps on estimating the risk of gastrointestinal stromal tumor recurrence: indications for adjuvant therapy: an analysis of the Kinki GIST registry.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Michael J CavnarDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Kenneth SeierDepartment of Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Christina CurtinDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Vinod P BalachandranDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Daniel G CoitDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Sam S YoonDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Aimee M CragoDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Vivian E StrongDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
William D TapDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Mithat GönenDepartment of Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Cristina R AntonescuDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Murray F BrennanDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Sam SingerDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Ronald P DeMatteoDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Targeting Oncogenic Pathways in Genetically Complex SarcomasP50CA217694 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI Marc Ladanyi · 2018 to 2026
$21.5M
Molecular Mechanisms in Gastrointestinal Stromal TumorR01CA102613 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Ronald P. Dematteo · 2004 to 2026
$9.2M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P50 CA217694NCI NIH HHS R01 CA102613
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo characterize the results of surgery for gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) in the pre and post-imatinib eras at a single institution and to identify current prognostic clinicopathologic factors.

backgroundImatinib has radically changed the management of GIST, yet the magnitude of impact on outcome across the spectrum of GIST presentation and relevance of historical prognostic factors are not well defined.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 1000 patients who underwent surgery for GIST at our institution from 1982 to 2016. Patients were stratified by presentation status as primary tumor only (PRIM), primary with synchronous metastasis (PRIM + MET), or metachronous recurrence/metastases (MET), and also imatinib era (before and after it became available). Cox proportional-hazard models and Kaplan-Meier methods were used to model and estimate overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS).

resultsOS was longer in the imatinib era compared with the pre-imatinib era in each presentation group, including in Miettinen high-risk primary tumors. Among PRIM patients from the pre-imatinib era, tumor site, size, and mitotic rate were independently associated with OS and RFS on multivariate analysis. PRIM patients in the imatinib era who received imatinib (neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant) had higher risk tumors, but after adjusting for treatment, only size >10 cm remained independently prognostic of RFS [hazard ratio (HR) 3.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.00-7.40, P < 0.0001) and OS (HR 3.37, 95% CI 1.60-7.13, P = 0.001)].

conclusionsPatients treated in the imatinib era had prolonged OS across all presentations. In the imatinib era, among site, size, and mitotic rate, high-risk features were associated with treatment with the drug, but only size >10 cm correlated with outcome. Imatinib should still be prescribed for patients with high-risk features.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsChildFemaleGastrointestinal Stromal TumorsHumansImatinib MesylateMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAntineoplastic AgentsImatinib Mesylate

Identifiers

PMID30946076
PMCPMC6774913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.