ArticleJournal of genetics2019
Novel mutation in
Article in Journal of genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- 3-M syndrome: evolution of the phenotype over time.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2025Review
- Long-term follow-up of growth and puberty in 3-M syndrome: effects of growth hormone therapy and response variability.Endocrine · 2025Article
- Familial 3M Syndrome - as an Example of Diagnostic Difficulties in Rare Genetic Syndromes.The application of clinical genetics · 2025Article
- 3M syndrome in Saudi Arabia: a case series study and literature review.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Review
- Genetic Background of Fetal Growth Restriction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- From Anti-EBV Immune Responses to the EBV Diseasome via Cross-reactivity.Global medical genetics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluates a family with two siblings having severe growth retardation and facial dysmorphism, born to consanguineous normal healthy parents. Affymetrix CytoScan 750K microarray showed a 34-Mb pericentric homozygous region on chromosome 6 for both siblings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30945686W2919579624What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.