Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30945292›Full record

ArticleJournal of anatomy2019

Cervical vertebral body growth and emergence of sexual dimorphism: a developmental study using computed tomography.

Courtney A Miller, Seong Jae Hwang, Meghan M Cotter, Houri K Vorperian

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of anatomy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Spinopelvic alignment and lumbar vertebral shape in children: associations with structural spinal abnormalities and body composition in the generation R study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Courtney A MillerVocal Tract Development Lab, Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0748-4290
Seong Jae HwangDepartment of Computer Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Meghan M CotterMedical Education Office, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Houri K VorperianVocal Tract Development Lab, Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6074-0110
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

WISCONSIN CENTER ON MENTAL RETARDATION: CORE SUPPORTP30HD003352 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI MESSING, ALBEE · 1985 to 2015
$25.2M
MRI &CT Studies of the Developing Vocal TractR01DC006282 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI VORPERIAN, HOURI KALOUSTIAN · 2003 to 2018
$7.9M
Waisman Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center Down Syndrome RegistryU54HD090256 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI POLLAK, SETH D · 2016 to 2020
$6.0M
NICHD NIH HHS P30 HD003352NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD090256NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC006282
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The size and shape of human cervical vertebral bodies serve as a reference for measurement or treatment planning in multiple disciplines. It is therefore necessary to understand thoroughly the developmental changes in the cervical vertebrae in relation to the changing biomechanical demands on the neck during the first two decades of life. To delineate sex-specific changes in human cervical vertebral bodies, 23 landmarks were placed in the midsagittal plane to define the boundaries of C2 to C7 in 123 (73 M; 50 F) computed tomography scans from individuals, ages 6 months to 19 years. Size was calculated as the geometric area, from which sex-specific growth trend, rate, and type for each vertebral body were determined, as well as length measures of local deformation-based morphometry vectors from the centroid to each landmark. Additionally, for each of the four pubertal-staged age cohorts, sex-specific vertebral body wireframes were superimposed using generalized Procrustes analysis to determine sex-specific changes in form (size and shape) and shape alone. Our findings reveal that C2 was unique in achieving more of its adult size by 5 years, particularly in females. In contrast, C3-C7 had a second period of accelerated growth during puberty. The vertebrae of males and females were significantly different in size, particularly after puberty, when males had larger cervical vertebral bodies. Male growth outpaced female growth around age 10 years and persisted until around age 19-20 years, whereas females completed growth earlier, around age 17-18 years. The greatest shape differences between males and females occurred during puberty. Both sexes had similar growth in the superoinferior height, but males also displayed more growth in anteroposterior depth. Such prominent sex differences in size, shape, and form are likely the result of differences in growth rate and growth duration. Female vertebrae are thus not simply smaller versions of the male vertebrae. Additional research is needed to further quantify growth and help improve age- and sex-specific guidance in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Sex CharacteristicsAdolescentCervical VertebraeChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantMaleYoung Adultcervical vertebraeCervical Vertebral Maturation Indexcomputed tomographygrowth and developmenthumansexual dimorphismsize and shapevertebral body

Identifiers

PMID30945292
PMCPMC6534438
OpenAlexW2927789401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.