Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30945281›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of animal ecology2019

Insectivorous bats integrate social information about species identity, conspecific activity and prey abundance to estimate cost-benefit ratio of interactions.

Daniel Lewanzik, Arun K Sundaramurthy, Holger R Goerlitz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of animal ecology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Seasonality over lunar phases drives flight activity of co-roosting bats, Rhinolophus rouxii and Rousettus leschenaultii, in Western Ghats, India.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Bats use social information within and across species.The Journal of animal ecology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daniel LewanzikAcoustic and Functional Ecology, Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, Seewiesen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3305-6556
Arun K SundaramurthyAcoustic and Functional Ecology, Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, Seewiesen, Germany.
Holger R GoerlitzAcoustic and Functional Ecology, Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, Seewiesen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9677-8073

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animals can use inadvertent social information to improve fitness-relevant decisions, for instance about where to forage or with whom to interact. Since bats emit high-amplitude species-specific echolocation calls when flying, they provide a constant flow of inadvertent social information to others who can decode that acoustic information. Of particular interest is the rate of feeding buzzes-characteristic call sequences preceding any prey capture-which correlates with insect abundance. Previous studies investigating eavesdropping in bats yielded very different and in part contradictory results likely because they commonly focused on single species only, differed substantially in playback buzz rate and did usually not account for (baseline) conspecific activity. Our goal was to overcome these limitations and systematically test which inadvertent social information bats integrate when eavesdropping on others and how this integration affects space use and both intra- and interspecific interactions, respectively. We used a community-wide approach and investigated the effects of a broad range of playback feeding buzz rates and conspecific activity on eavesdropping responses in 24 bat species combinations in the wild. For the first time, we reveal that finely graded and density-dependent eavesdropping responses are not limited to particular foraging styles or call types, but instead are ubiquitous among insectivorous bats. All bats integrated social information about calling species identity, prey abundance and conspecific activity to estimate the cost-benefit ratio of prospective interactions, yet in a species-specific manner. The effect of buzz rate was multifaceted, as bats responded differently to different buzz rates, and responses were additionally modulated by heterospecific recognition. Conspecific activity, in contrast, had a negative effect on the eavesdropping responses of all bats. These findings can explain the inconsistent results of previous studies and advance our understanding of the complex nature of conspecific and heterospecific interactions within bat communities. A comprehensive understanding of how bats incorporate social information into their decision-making will help researchers to explain species distribution patterns and eventually to unravel mechanisms of species coexistence.

Indexed as

ChiropteraEcholocationAnimalsPredatory BehaviorProspective StudiesSpecies Specificitybatsbiosonarcompetitioneavesdroppingecholocationheterospecific interactionsheterospecific recognitioninformation transfer

Identifiers

PMID30945281
PMCPMC6849779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.