Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30945237›Full record

ArticleCurrent reviews in musculoskeletal medicine2019

ACL Reconstruction with Augmentation: a Scoping Review.

Michael D Riediger, Devon Stride, Sarah E Coke, Adrian Z Kurz, Andrew Duong, Olufemi R Ayeni

Registry-linked trialAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05270551 (The Effect of Accelerated Rehabilitation After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With and Without Suture Tape Reinforcement), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05270551 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Accelerated Rehabilitation After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With and Without Suture Tape Reinforcement

TypeinterventionalSponsorAssiut UniversityRan2026 to 2027Enrolled114ConditionsACL InjuryArmsACL Reconstruction
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Advanced Gene Therapy Strategies for the Repair of ACL Injuries.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michael D RiedigerDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Devon StrideDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Sarah E CokeDepartment of Medicine, Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada.
Adrian Z KurzDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Andrew DuongDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Olufemi R AyeniDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. ayenif@mcmaster.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewWe reviewed the recent literature to identify and summarize new research surrounding anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with augmentation in the form of additional soft tissue procedures or biologic augmentation. Specifically, we wanted to review the failure rates of these procedures in both the primary and revision settings.

methodsThe databases Embase, PubMed, and Medline were searched on August 13, 2018, for English-language studies that reported on the use of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (primary and revision) in conjunction with either soft tissue or biologic augmentation. The studies were systematically screened and data abstracted in duplicates. RECENT

findingsAdvancements in ACLR surgery, including soft tissue augmentation, may decrease primary and revision surgery failure rates for high-risk patients. The use of biological augmentation has shown histologic and radiographic improvements. These differences, however, have failed to be statistically significant and have not resulted in clinically significant improvements in outcome. The limited body of evidence has shown that the addition of soft tissue procedures may in fact lower the risk of graft re-rupture rates particularly in revision or in patients wishing to return to high-risk sports and activities. The use of biologic augmentation although promising in laboratory studies has yet to show any significant clinical results and therefore will require further studies to prove any efficacy.

Indexed as

Anterior cruciate ligamentAnterolateral ligamentLateral tenodesisLemairePlatelet-rich plasma

Identifiers

PMID30945237
PMCPMC6542956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.