Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30945139›Full record

ReviewCurrent nutrition reports2019

Excessive Consumption of Sugar: an Insatiable Drive for Reward.

Pawel K Olszewski, Erin L Wood, Anica Klockars, Allen S Levine

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current nutrition reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Tolerable upper intake level for dietary sugars.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Sustainable isomaltulose production inFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  20. Sugars and Sweet Taste: Addictive or Rewarding?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pawel K OlszewskiDepartment of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA.
Erin L WoodDepartment of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Anica KlockarsDepartment of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Allen S LevineDepartment of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA. aslevine@umn.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewEating behavior provides energy to ensure proper functioning of the organism. Reward aids in seeking foods that bring energy and pleasant taste, whose consumption is safe. As evidenced by the obesity "epidemic" which largely stems from overeating, reward becomes a detriment when palatable tastants are available in unlimited quantities. This review presents recent evidence on mechanisms underlying palatability-driven excessive consumption of sugar. RECENT

findingsAppetite for sugar is propelled by changes in the morphology and activity of the reward system reminiscent of addiction. Sugar intake also shifts the hunger-satiety continuum, facilitating initiation of consumption in the absence of energy needs and maintenance of feeding despite ingestion of large food loads that endanger homeostasis. Ingestion of excessive amounts of sugar relies on triggering mechanisms that promote addictive-like behaviors, and on overriding neuroendocrine signals that protect internal milieu.

Indexed as

Behavior, AddictiveRewardAnimalsAppetiteBrainEatingFeeding BehaviorHumansHyperphagiaObesitySugarsTasteSugarsAddictionAdolescentRewardSugarSweetWithdrawal

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.