Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30945112›Full record

ArticleIrish journal of medical science2019

Patient satisfaction with a multidisciplinary colorectal and urogynaecology service.

Bobby D O'Leary, Gerard J Agnew, Myra Fitzpatrick, Ann M Hanly

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. High patient satisfaction and increased physical activity following a remote multidisciplinary team multiple myeloma clinic.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bobby D O'LearyPelvic Floor Centre, St. Michael's Hospital, Dún Laoghaire, Dublin, Ireland. robert.oleary@ucd.ie.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0793-9021
Gerard J AgnewPelvic Floor Centre, St. Michael's Hospital, Dún Laoghaire, Dublin, Ireland.
Myra FitzpatrickPelvic Floor Centre, St. Michael's Hospital, Dún Laoghaire, Dublin, Ireland.
Ann M HanlyPelvic Floor Centre, St. Michael's Hospital, Dún Laoghaire, Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTraditionally, the pelvic floor has been described as three separate compartments and problems in each compartment were managed separately. A more contemporary approach is to identify the entire pelvic floor as a single dynamic compartment. Multidisciplinary pelvic floor clinics such as ours with the support of physiotherapy, clinical nurse specialists, urodynamics, and endo-anal ultrasound are uncommon. The aim of this study was to assess patient satisfaction with a joint colorectal and urogynaecology clinic.

methodAll women who attended our service in 2015 were identified. Women who saw both a colorectal surgeon and urogynaecologist at the same clinic were included. The Satisfaction with Outpatient Services questionnaire, a multi-dimensional outpatient survey, was mailed to all women.

resultsA total of 364 new women attended our service in 2015. One hundred thirty-six (35.2%) saw both a colorectal surgeon and urogynaecologist at the same visit. There was a 64% (87/136) response rate to the questionnaire. Overall, all questions regarding their attendance were responded to positively by 94% (82/87) of women. Confidence and trust in the doctor examining and treating them was reported by all women. Seeing multiple specialists was of benefit to 97% (84/87) of women and 94% (82/87) would recommend the Pelvic Floor Centre.

conclusionThere is a high level of satisfaction amongst women attending our outpatient service. Being seen by multiple specialities at a single clinic was felt to be of benefit by the majority of women and all expressed physician confidence. Our multidisciplinary service may reduce waiting times, increase satisfaction, and is likely cost-effective.

Indexed as

Ambulatory Care FacilitiesFemaleGynecologyHumansPatient SatisfactionPelvic FloorPelvic Floor DisordersSurveys and QuestionnairesMultidisciplinary carePatient satisfactionPelvic floor dysfunctionUrogynaecology

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.