Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30945052›Full record

ArticleBiomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology2019

On the AIC-based model reduction for the general Holzapfel-Ogden myocardial constitutive law.

Debao Guan, Faizan Ahmad, Peter Theobald, Shwe Soe, Xiaoyu Luo, Hao Gao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A modelling study of right ventricular growth with valvular regurgitation.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Constitutive discovery in the living human heart.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Bayesian optimisation for efficient parameter inference in a cardiac mechanics model of the left ventricle.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Debao GuanSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Faizan AhmadSchool of Engineering, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Peter TheobaldSchool of Engineering, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Shwe SoeSchool of Engineering, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Xiaoyu LuoSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK. Xiaoyu.Luo@glasgow.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8753-4210
Hao GaoSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6852-9435

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/N014642/1University of Glasgow Fee waiver 2017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Constitutive laws that describe the mechanical responses of cardiac tissue under loading hold the key to accurately model the biomechanical behaviour of the heart. There have been ample choices of phenomenological constitutive laws derived from experiments, some of which are quite sophisticated and include effects of microscopic fibre structures of the myocardium. A typical example is the strain-invariant-based Holzapfel-Ogden 2009 model that is excellently fitted to simple shear tests. It has been widely used and regarded as the state-of-the-art constitutive law for myocardium. However, there has been no analysis to show if it has both adequate descriptive and predictive capabilities for other tissue tests of myocardium. Indeed, such an analysis is important for any constitutive laws for clinically useful computational simulations. In this work, we perform such an analysis using combinations of tissue tests, uniaxial tension, biaxial tension and simple shear from three different sets of myocardial tissue studies. Starting from the general 14-parameter myocardial constitutive law developed by Holzapfel and Ogden, denoted as the general HO model, we show that this model has good descriptive and predictive capabilities for all the experimental tests. However, to reliably determine all 14 parameters of the model from experiments remains a great challenge. Our aim is to reduce the constitutive law using Akaike information criterion, to maintain its mechanical integrity whilst achieving minimal computational cost. A competent constitutive law should have descriptive and predictive capabilities for different tissue tests. By competent, we mean the model has least terms but is still able to describe and predict experimental data. We also investigate the optimal combinations of tissue tests for a given constitutive model. For example, our results show that using one of the reduced HO models, one may need just one shear response (along normal-fibre direction) and one biaxial stretch (ratio of 1 mean fibre : 1 cross-fibre) to satisfactorily describe Sommer et al. human myocardial mechanical properties. Our study suggests that single-state tests (i.e. simple shear or stretching only) are insufficient to determine the myocardium responses. We also found it is important to consider transmural fibre rotations within each myocardial sample of tests during the fitting process. This is done by excluding un-stretched fibres using an "effective fibre ratio", which depends on the sample size, shape, local myofibre architecture and loading conditions. We conclude that a competent myocardium material model can be obtained from the general HO model using AIC analysis and a suitable combination of tissue tests.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAlgorithmsAnimalsFinite Element AnalysisHumansMyocardiumStress, MechanicalSus scrofaAkaike information criterion (AIC)Biaxial testsHolzapfel–Ogden (HO) constitutive lawMyocardial mechanical testsReduced HO modelsSimple shear testsUniaxial tests

Identifiers

PMID30945052
PMCPMC6647490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.